QV recommends probe against Thomas Chandy

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Jan 4, 2018, 6:26 am IST
Updated Jan 4, 2018, 6:26 am IST
There were also reports that the Vigilance was exploring the option of not naming Mr Chandy as an accused in the FIR in the initial stage.
Thomas Chandy (Photo: PEETHAMBARAN PAYYERI)
 Thomas Chandy (Photo: PEETHAMBARAN PAYYERI)

Thiruvananthapuram: The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau will register a case in connection with the alleged irregularities and land encroachments pertaining to the Lake Palace resort of former transport minister Thomas Chandy in Alappuzha.

According to sources, the VACB will submit a preliminary inquiry report into the allegations against Mr. Chandy before the court on Thursday. The VACB is likely to recommend an inquiry by the revenue department into the alleged violations of Kerala Conservation of Paddyland and Wetland Act. VACB eastern range SP Johnson Joseph who conducted the preliminary inquiry submitted the report to Vigilance director Loknath Behera last week. 

 

Sources said that the inquiry had found prima facie irregularities by Mr  Thomas Chandy.  About 25 officials were also found prima facie guilty.

The inquiry commissioner and special judge (Vigilance) in Kottayam had earlier ordered a preliminary inquiry on the basis of a petition alleging irregularities in the construction of Valiyakulam- Zero jetty road, which leads to Mr Chandy's resort,  using the MPs’ funds of Mr  P.J. Kurian and Mr K.E. Ismail.  They may also come under the purview of the investigation. 

There were also reports that the Vigilance was exploring the option of not naming Mr Chandy as an accused in the FIR in the initial stage. It may be recalled that Mr Behera had recently issued a circular that a person need to be  arraigned as accused in a case only if there is  sufficient evidence.

The Vigilance had also received petitions regarding several other allegations in connection with Mr Chandy's resort. They  would be also brought under the purview of the detailed investigation after registering the case. Since some of the allegations pertained to violation of Kerala Conservation of Paddyland and Wetland Act, the Vigilance may recommend action by the revenue department also, said sources.





ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT