Top

Hit-and-run case: Salman Khan gets bail, greets fans after Bombay HC suspends 5-year jail term

Salman Khan gets 2 weeks to furnish bail bond of Rs 30,000

Mumbai: Bollywood superstar Salman Khan on Friday furnished a bail bond of Rs 30,000 in the Mumbai Sessions Court, before returning to his Bandra home, where a swarm of fans had gathered to catch his glimpse. The Bombay High Court on Friday suspended the five-year sentence awarded to him in the 2002 hit-and-run case, admitted his appeal against conviction and granted him bail.

Khan, who was at his Galaxy Apartments residence in suburban Bandra, soon stepped out to loud cheers from delirious fans. As the superstar, dressed in blue jeans, white shirt and sporting sunglasses, left for the sessions court in his Mercedes SUV at the head of a convoy of vehicles, jubilant supporters were seen sprinting in pursuit.

Read: Salman Khan reaches home, greets his fans and supporters

The crowds that had parked themselves outside the star's residence left only after he gestured them to return to their homes. He folded his hands in gratitude and waved at them for a brief while before retreating from the balcony.

His father, scriptwriter Salim Khan, mother Salma, brother Arbaaz and sister Arpita also made a brief appearance on the balcony with him.

Earlier in the day, Justice Abhay Thipsay directed Khan to surrender before the trial court forthwith and execute a fresh bail bond of Rs 30,000. The interim bail granted to the actor hours after his conviction and sentencing on Wednesday was to expire today.

Read: Salman Khan won’t go to jail for now, Bombay HC grants him 2-day interim bail in 2002 hit-and-run case

While admitting the 49-year-old actor's appeal, the HC said it would expedite the hearing on it and posted the matter for June 15. "This is not a case where I should keep him (Khan) in jail till his appeal is heard and decided. Why his right should suffer when his appeal is admitted and kept pending? In many cases people have suffered and spent their entire prison term only to be acquitted later by the High Court," Justice Thipsay observed.

Salman Khan waves at his fans & supporters from his residence. (Photo: Twitter)

"The normal rule is that when an appeal is admitted and the sentence is under seven years, it (the sentence) is suspended. Why do you (prosecution) want to depart from this norm?" the court said.

Read: Salman Khan fan allegedly attempts suicide outside High Court

Justice Thipsay noted that Khan has been on bail throughout the trial even after being slapped with the serious charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. "There are a number of arguable points raised about whether or not Khan was driving the car. It is also nobody's case that Khan will abscond if he released on bail, pending appeal," he said.

Justice Thipsay directed Khan to seek court's permission before travelling abroad. Soon after the high court's order, a visibly relieved Salman, dressed in casuals and sporting sun glasses, left his Bandra residence for the sessions court in the Fort area of south Mumbai to execute the fresh bail bond.

Jubilant fans and well-wishers, who had gathered outside his residence since morning, erupted in joy when the news reached them.

Read: All charges against you are proved, says judge as teary-eyed Salman listens to verdict

The prosecution case is that Khan ran over five persons sleeping on the pavement in suburban Bandra, where the actor also resides, before ramming a bakery with his SUV on September 28, 2002, killing one person and injuring four.

The trial court had on Wednesday convicted and sentenced him to five years' rigorous imprisonment on the charge of culpable homicide and under various other provisions of IPC and other laws.

Khan's lawyer Amit Desai argued that the trial court had not considered the defence of the accused that there were four persons in the car, including his driver Ashok Singh, who was behind the wheel at the time of the accident.

He read out the evidence of four witnesses, including the investigating officer, who had said there were four people in the vehicle.

Desai also argued that prosecution's sole eyewitness Ravindra Patil (Khan's then police bodyguard) was an "unwilling witness" and he was "forced" to give his evidence about Khan driving the car.

Read: Salman guilty: Twitteratti divided, but some posts are just bizarre

The lawyer said Patil had in an interview a day after the accident said there were four persons in the car. However, during the trial, he contradicted himself by saying there were only three persons.

Desai said the trial court judgement holding that Khan was driving the car and that he was under the influence of liquor was not satisfactory. He also said that the trial court had failed to consider the defence plea of a 'tyre burst' having caused the accident.

Khan's lawyer also questioned the prosecution's failure to examine singer Kamaal Khan, who was present in the car at the relevant time along with the actor and was a key eye witness.

Read: Salman Khan punished as he belongs to minority community, says Samajwadi Party leader

Government pleader Sandeep Shinde, though not opposing the admission of appeal, objected to suspension of the sentence and argued that Khan had knowledge of consequences of rash and negligent and drunken driving. Therefore, he said, the trial court had rightly convicted Khan under the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Shinde said the blood test of Khan revealed there was alcohol content above the permissible limit. He said while Kamaal Khan's statement was recorded by police during investigation, he was not available to them for examination before the trial court as he was a UK national.

Refuting the defence claim of four persons travelling in the vehicle, Shinde said the theory of Ashok Singh being at the wheel was introduced at the fag end of the trial when Khan made a statement under section 313 of CrPC and termed it as an "afterthought".

While Salman chose to keep away from the hearing on Friday, his sister Alvira was present.

Read: Salman Khan did not run away after the accident: Lawyer

During the trial, the defence claimed that Khan had been drinking water and had climbed out of the car through the driver's seat after the accident because the passenger side door had been damaged.

But several prosecution witnesses, including survivors of the crash, testified that Khan was driving the vehicle when it ploughed at speed into the men sleeping on the street near a bakery in September 2002.

Read: Bad boy to superstar, Salman 'Dabangg' Khan comes a long way

Salman, who is on bail since last 13 years in this case, was not expected to be present in the High Court today.

There was a lot of commotion outside the High Court as the hearing proceeded -- sporadic protests against bail to the actor and a fan also allegedly tried to commit suicide, demanding that he be jailed instead of the actor.

Read: Salman Khan’s hit and run case: Judge didn’t believe the tyre burst story

Khan is the second big-name Bollywood actor to be sentenced in the last two years. Sanjay Dutt, the star of a series of gangster movies, is behind bars over possession of weapons linked to several bombings in Mumbai in 1993.

( Source : dc/pti )
Next Story