Top

Smriti Irani case: Fabindia's senior officials seek anticipatory bail

Fabindia has denied it had placed hidden cameras in any of its stores

Panaji: Seven senior officials of Fabindia, including its CEO and MD, have applied for anticipatory bail in a Goa court after being summoned by police in connection with a voyeurism case.

Company's Managing Director William Bissel, Chief Executive Officer Subrata Dutta and five others applied for anticipatory bail yesterday in district court in Mapusa town, Superintendent of Police (CB) Kartik Kashyap told PTI on Thursday.

The other five officials who have sought anticipatory bail to avoid arrest are - Fabindia's regional manager Ruchira Pujari, marketing chief Ramu Chandra, stores in-charge Kundan Gupta, E-commerce head Arun Naikar and category head Ashima Agarwal, he said.

Read: Smriti Irani case: Goa police summons Fabindia bosses, 9 other employees for questioning

Their applications would be heard today by the court. The district court had earlier this week granted anticipatory bail to Fabindia's Candolim store manager Chaitrali Sawant, who was questioned by crime branch yesterday.

Kashyap said that several Fabindia officials have been summoned for questioning today while the company's MD and CEO have agreed to be present before the investigators tomorrow.

Fabindia employees, accused in CCTV camera case, being taken to court in Mapusa. (Photo: PTI/File)

Goa police had arrested four employees of Fabindia outlet at Candolim village near here after Union HRD minister Smriti Irani, who visited the store on April 3, alleged that it had a CCTV camera focusing at the trial room.

Read: While trying clothes, Smriti Irani spots camera pointed at trial room of Fabindia store in Goa

They were booked under IPC sections 354C (voyeurism), 509 (intrusion into privacy) and IT Act's section 66E (capturing, publishing image of private area of any person without his/her consent). They were later granted bail.

Fabindia has denied it had placed hidden cameras in any of its stores, holding that the camera in question was part of the surveillance system.

( Source : PTI )
Next Story