68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
World Europe 30 May 2019 Boris faces court fo ...

Boris faces court for lying on Brexit

Published May 30, 2019, 1:52 am IST
Updated May 30, 2019, 1:52 am IST
The exact amount of Britain's net and gross EU contributions was one of the biggest issues during the 2016 referendum campaign.
 New British foreign minister Boris Johnson (Photo: AP)
  New British foreign minister Boris Johnson (Photo: AP)

London: Boris Johnson, the frontrunner to become Britain’s next prime minister, must attend court over allegations that he knowingly lied during the Brexit referendum campaign, a judge announced on Wednesday.

Johnson, the former foreign secretary, will be summoned to appear before a court over allegations of misconduct in public office, judge Margot Coleman said in a written decision, without specifying the date.


The case is over the claim that Britain sends £350 million a week to the European Union.

The exact amount of Britain’s net and gross EU contributions was one of the biggest issues during the 2016 referendum campaign. Businessmen Mar-cus Ball has crowdfunded the private prosecution. Coleman’s decision follows a hearing last week at Westminster Magistrates Court in London.

“The allegations which have been made are unproven accusations and I do not make any findings of fact,” the judge said.

“Having considered all the relevant factors I am satisfied that this is a proper case to issue the summons as requested,” she wrote.

Referring to Johnson as the “proposed defendant”, Coleman said he would be required to attend a preliminary hearing that could then result in a trial.

Johnson ‘repeatedly lied’

Johnson is considered the favourite among the 11 candidates vying to replace the outgoing Theresa May as leader of the governing Conserva-tive Party, and therefore prime minister, by the end of July.

The summons application made by Ball's lawyers alleges that Johnson “repeatedly lied and misled the British public as to the cost of EU membership” and “knew that such comments were false or misleading”.

“Lying on a national and international platform undermines public confidence in politics.”

The maximum penalty for misconduct in public office is life imprisonment. The elements of the offence are that a public officer, acting as such, wilfully neglects to perform their duty or wilfully commits misconduct to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the officeholder, and does so without reasonable excuse or justification. Johnson was not present at last week’s hearing, but his lawyer Adrian Darbi-shire said the pro-Brexit figurehead staunchly denied acting in an improper or dishonest manner.

‘Unusual and exceptional’

Coleman considered whether the case had been brought purely to annoy Johnson.

The former London mayor’s position is that the application is a politically-motivated stunt as part of a campaign to undermine the referendum result, and/or to prevent its consequences.

Britain is due to leave the European Union on October 31.

“I accept the defence submission that when the applicant commenced his consideration of whether to bring a private prosecution against the proposed defendant, some three years ago, there may have been a political purpose to these proceedings,” Coleman said.

“However, the information for the summons was laid on February 28, 2019 and that argument in my view is no longer pertinent.

“I do not accept the application is vexatious.”

In her 14-page decision, the judge said: “This is an unusual and exceptional application with a considerable public interest and it is right that full reasons are provided.”