137th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra49026232728117092 Tamil Nadu2850242275754690 Andhra Pradesh2069601204641842 Karnataka164924842322998 Delhi1427231282324082 Uttar Pradesh113378668341981 West Bengal89666630601954 Bihar7179446294400 Gujarat68855517922604 Assam5549737225132 Rajasthan4941835186763 Odisha4255028698292 Haryana4005433444467 Madhya Pradesh3729827621962 Kerala3170019147103 Jammu and Kashmir2392716218449 Punjab2193014040539 Jharkhand165427503154 Chhatisgarh11408831987 Uttarakhand89015731112 Goa7947559570 Telangana751354330615 Tripura6014408437 Puducherry5123291475 Manipur3466192610 Himachal Pradesh3206200813 Nagaland26578247 Arunachal Pradesh204913263 Chandigarh137482023 Meghalaya10234236 Sikkim8544061 Mizoram5672890
Technology Other News 07 Aug 2019 WhatsApp fighting wi ...

WhatsApp fighting with Indian government over users’ anonymity

Published Aug 7, 2019, 12:16 pm IST
Updated Aug 7, 2019, 12:16 pm IST
The instant messaging giant is fighting to keep its millions of users untraceable.
This case is the first of its kind in India to consider traceability on social media.
 This case is the first of its kind in India to consider traceability on social media.

The world’s most popular instant messaging service is facing an uphill battle in its fight against a Tamil Nadu courthouse in a lawsuit that may force them to forego or at the very least weaken its renowned privacy policies. As per a report by Buzzfeed, the Madras high court has recently started hearing a case by a couple of petitioners who are asking India to force people to link their WhatsApp accounts to their Aadhar card, which is the country’s controversial biometric ID number for virtually all its residents.

The people in question are Antony Clement Rubin and Janani Krishnamurthy, both private citizens and in their copies of their filings, they describe themselves animal welfare activists. The reason for their petition is to mandate people to link “any email or user account" to their Aadhar card “owing to the rising instances of humiliation, disgrace and defamation [through] cyberbullying and other intolerable activities on social media."


This case is the first of its kind in India to consider traceability on social media and it could set the ball rolling for all tech companies that operate in India to follow suit. Privacy experts believe that this petition is an easy opportunity for India’s nationalist government to force social media platforms to become one-stop surveillance tools.

par Gupta, director of the digital advocacy organization Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) said, “If the court directs a product change like breaking or weakening WhatsApp’s encryption, it won’t be limited to just WhatsApp but will extend to pretty much every single product and service that uses encryption in India. Buzzfeed reports that the IFF is an intervener and they have the ability to join any case without the permission of the original litigants in Rubin’s and Krishnamurthy’s petition. Gupta states, “Once you can trace a message, you can use it for methods of social control. That’s the primary objective of this.”


A WhatsApp spokesperson stated in February that the instant messaging platform is “a space for private conversations online.” It went on to add, “Imagine if every message that you sent was kept with a record of the fact that you sent it and with a record of your phone number. That would not be a place for private communications.”

Buzzfeed states, “The government remains focused on personal traceability. In October, it demanded the locations and phone numbers of people using WhatsApp for real-world violence, and in December, it proposed changes to the country’s IT law that would force platforms including WhatsApp to break their user encryption. Last month, it asked the company to digitally fingerprint every message to track the sender.”


India’s IT minister, Ravi Shankar Prasad said, “Traceability shall be [WhatsApp’s] job.”

WhatsApp is reportedly paying close attention to this case and they have summoned its top lawyer, Brian Hennessy to the hearing from California. WhatsApp also hired Arvind Datar and India’s former law minister Kapil Sibal to make its case before the judge. Buzzfeed reports that the arguments against traceability in the high court were stern. WhatsApp stated, “Requiring WhatsApp to trace originator information is disproportionate to the laudable aim of preventing and detecting crimes, particularly since users can easily migrate to encrypted platforms that do not have such an obligation.”


The instant messaging giant went on to state that its end-to-end encryption benefitted citizen’s fundamental rights and in turn enabled journalists, civil society organizations, members of ethnic and religious groups, activists, and artists to exercise their right to freedom of speech and expression “without fear of surveillance or retaliation.”

Buzzfeed reports that WhatsApp stated, “Imposing a traceability requirement would undermine all of these benefits. Journalists could be at risk of retaliation for investigating issues that may be unpopular, civil or political activists could be at risk of retaliation for discussing certain right and criticizing or advocating for politicians or political, and personal information like sexual orientation, health, religious affiliation, Aadhaar, and financial information could be at risk of becoming publicly exposed.”


Click on Deccan Chronicle Technology and Science for the latest news and reviews. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter