69th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Sports Other News 26 Aug 2016 Narsingh would have ...

Narsingh would have won the silver, claims WFI official

Published Aug 26, 2016, 9:21 pm IST
Updated Aug 26, 2016, 9:21 pm IST
WADA challenged the clean chit given to Narsingh by its Indian affiliate at CAS in Rio a day before he was set to take part in his fight.
CAS threw Narsingh out of the Games and also slapped a four-year ban on the Indian grappler after he failed to produce any
 CAS threw Narsingh out of the Games and also slapped a four-year ban on the Indian grappler after he failed to produce any "real evidence" regarding the sabotage theory. (Photo: PTI)

Mumbai: Continuing to back dope-tainted wrestler Narsingh Yadav, a top Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) official today claimed the 74-kg freestyle wrestler would have clinched the silver medal had he taken part in the Rio Olympics instead of being banned for four years by the CAS.

"Narsingh would have won at least a silver medal, I can assure you that," said WFI secretary V N Prasood here on the sidelines of a press conference to announce a world level prize money event.


Narsingh was exonerated on doping charges at home by NADA, which upheld his claim that his food/drink had been spiked with a banned substance during his stay while training for the Games at Sonepat in Haryana.

World Anti Doping Agency challenged the clean chit given to Narsingh by its Indian affiliate at the Court of Arbitration for Sports in Rio a day before he was set to take part in his weight class bouts.

CAS threw him out of the Games and also slapped a four-year ban on the Indian grappler after he failed to produce any "real evidence" regarding the sabotage theory he had presented.

In its ruling, the ad hoc panel of the CAS relied on expert evidence that Narsingh's dope offence was not due to one-time ingestion of the prohibited substance and its concentration in the first test result (of June 25) was so high that it had to come from an oral ingestion of one or two tablets of methandienone, rather than from a drink where the powder had been mixed with water.

Explaining the chronology of events leading to his ban Prasood said, "On August 18 Narsingh gave a medical at noon and had his weight-in at 1.30 pm. His name was even there in the fixtures. At 8.30 pm in the night CAS released their judgement.

"CAS told him give your weight, don't worry about anything in the afternoon, we'll give a result at night. So why should we have been thinking about it (ban)," asked Prasood when reporters questioned him on the matter.

"That's when we actually thought that after 21st they will take any action, (that) if they want to punish they will take away medal if Narsingh had won any medal," he said.

"The judgment was unexpected. If only they had given this verdict earlier, we could have sent Praveen Rana," he said.

Prasood defended WFI by saying Narsingh had been cleared to take part by the Indian Olympic Association, International Olympic Committee and world wrestling body, United World Wrestling before he was sent on the flight to Rio.

"There is no fault on part of the federation. NADA is the final authority on doping in India, they gave Narsingh clearance. WADA didn't directly do anything against our wrestler, they appealed to CAS.

"UWW gave its nod for Narsingh's participation, IOC gave its approval. After getting these two approvals, how could we have stopped Narsingh from going to Rio? "We didn't send Narsingh with our other wrestlers as we were waiting for WADA to make a move. But they didn't do anything. If WADA wanted to appeal, why didn't they appeal before 10th?

"How many days does WADA have to appeal? On August 2 we had a result from NADA, inside 24 hours WADA received the result. Narsingh left the country for Rio on 10th. WADA didn't do a thing against Narsingh until the 13th. They filed an appeal on 13th, federation didn't get any information till the 16th," he elaborated.

"We even named Praveen Rana as a replacement just in case Narsingh would have some issues going," he said, adding "Someone from India informed WADA that NADA only cleared Narsingh due to political pressure. That's why WADA appealed.

"If we had sent Praveen Rana instead, and he had lost earlier, the media only would have questioned me that why Narsingh wasn't sent despite getting clearance," he said.

Giving another twist to the episode, Prasood said the banned drug found in Narsingh's system was generally taken by people in their fifties to gain weight.

"This is not a drug to be used by an athlete. It's a drug taken by people who are over 55 years of age to gain body weight. Narsingh is already 76 kgs and he participates in the 74kg category. Why will he use it," the WFI secretary wondered, adding it indicated that he was "intentionally given the drug by someone."

"NADA told us they got information on July 4 that Narsingh was using a banned substance. But they still haven't sent the federation a copy of the letter," Prasood said.

WFI has demanded a CBI inquiry into the Narsingh doping issue and Prasood explained why the wrestling federation wanted the police case to be handed over to the central investigating agency.

"In India, when an FIR is filed, action has to be taken in 90 days. That's what the Constitution of India says. But CAS said we don't want your Constitution. Haryana Police has not arrested anyone, that's why we're urging the CBI to probe the matter," he said.

"We'll also take action if Narsingh is found guilty.

Otherwise, we'll appeal if the police can find the culprit and the court finds him guilty. We'll act after a court action.

"If someone is arrested and action is taken against them the ban (by CAS) can be reduced," he added.

Two-time Olympic medal winner Sushil Kumar had moved the court after WFI had refused a trial bout between him and Narsingh after the latter had earned a quota place for the country, but the WFI official queered the pitch by saying Rana had stood second in pre-Games trial behind the shamed wrestler.

"Sushil Kumar is a great wrestler. He knew all procedures. Praveen Rana was second in trial after Narsingh, so he would have taken us to court if we had named Sushil as a standby for Narsingh," was the strange explanation given by Prasood when queried why Sushil was not made a standby.

Sushil won bronze and silver medals in the 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games, but WFI preferred Narsingh to represent India in the 74-kg weight class instead of the decorated grappler as the dope-tainted grappler had clinched the country's quota by winning the bronze at the last world championship.