ICC's USD 400 million offer far less than what India deserves: Amitabh Choudhary
Mumbai: BCCI's acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary has said that the USD 400 million offer presented by the International Cricket Council (ICC) before
"Because it is far less than what
The BCCI secretary contended that the Indian market contributed 70 percent of the global cricket revenue and, therefore, it was natural for
"Why do you forget that a disproportionate share of revenues to cricket comes from
"The facts are that over 70 per cent of cricket's revenue world over comes from the Indian market. That [the $293 million offered by the ICC] is not even close to the contribution that
The ICC on Thursday abolished the 'Big Three system' and approved a new financial model after its meet in
This might not have gone down well with the Indian board as the new model eats into its share.
ICC independent chairman Shashank Manohar had initially offered a compromise formula of an additional 100 million dollars, which would push the BCCI's share to almost 400 million dollars.
However, BCCI rejected this with a counter-offer under which it would still get its 570 million dollars but no other full member's share would be reduced.
Manohar, had in February while presenting the finance model for the first time, had said the basic premise was to allow every member country to get an equitable share.
To which the BCCI had objected, saying it could not accept the finance model without any scientific basis.
Choudhary further said that any decision on revoking the Members Participation Agreement (MPA) could only be taken by the BCCI, which has called for a special general body meeting (SGM) on May 7.
With the new revenue model getting the nod, BCCI will now have to do with what they have in the eight-year cycle. The England Cricket Board received 143 million dollars while Zimbabwe Cricket received 94 million dollars.
The remaining seven Full Members will receive 132 million dollars each. The Associate Members will receive a funding of 280 million dollars. This model was passed by a vote of 13 to 1.