137th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra49026232728117092 Tamil Nadu2850242275754690 Andhra Pradesh2069601204641842 Karnataka164924842322998 Delhi1427231282324082 Uttar Pradesh113378668341981 West Bengal89666630601954 Bihar7179446294400 Gujarat68855517922604 Assam5549737225132 Rajasthan4941835186763 Odisha4255028698292 Haryana4005433444467 Madhya Pradesh3729827621962 Kerala3170019147103 Jammu and Kashmir2392716218449 Punjab2193014040539 Jharkhand165427503154 Chhatisgarh11408831987 Uttarakhand89015731112 Goa7947559570 Telangana751354330615 Tripura6014408437 Puducherry5123291475 Manipur3466192610 Himachal Pradesh3206200813 Nagaland26578247 Arunachal Pradesh204913263 Chandigarh137482023 Meghalaya10234236 Sikkim8544061 Mizoram5672890
Sports Cricket 21 Nov 2018 BCCI had wish for bi ...

BCCI had wish for bilateral cricket but PCB needed it: ICC dispute resolution panel

PTI
Published Nov 21, 2018, 9:28 am IST
Updated Nov 21, 2018, 9:54 am IST
The ICC panel rejected PCB’s Rs 447 crore compensation claim against the BCCI for not playing six bilateral series between 2015 to 2023.
The panel took into account the tense relations between the two neighbours. (Photo: AP)
 The panel took into account the tense relations between the two neighbours. (Photo: AP)

Dubai: The International Cricket Council’s Dispute Resolution Committee, which dismissed Pakistan Cricket Board’s compensation claim against the Board of Control for Cricket in India, has stated it was Pakistan that needed bilateral cricket between the two countries while India ‘may have had the wish’, PTI reported.

In its 26-page judgement, the ICC panel explained why it rejected PCB’s Rs 447 crore compensation claim against the BCCI for not playing six bilateral series between 2015 to 2023.

 

“In terms of any Indian tour to Pakistan, it was the PCB which was the suppliant. It was the host country which benefited from the revenues in respect of such as tour. Bankrupts cannot be choosers, and while the PCB was certainly not bankrupt, at the very least sacrifice of such a tour would, as Mr (Subhan) Ahmad (PCB COO) put it, ‘definitely make a dent in our financial reserves’,” said the panel.

“The prospect of bilateral tours with India as tourist was, in the PCB’s own words, ‘the most valuable prize in world cricket’ but ex hypothesi for other ICC Members, not the BCCI itself.

 

“By contrast there was no necessity for the BCCI, the dominant force in world cricket in the modern era, to play away against Pakistan. The BCCI may have had the wish, but it was the PCB which had the need.”

The panel also referred to the view of then BCCI GM Ratnakar Shetty on the resumption of Indo-Pak cricketing ties. “The record shows unequivocally that it was the PCB which, from 9 January 2014, the date of the ICC meeting in Dubai, took the initiative in seeking to agree future matches with the BCCI, not vice versa.

 

“Although it is common ground that, as Professor Shetty put it, ‘India-Pakistan matches are the best possible games that can happen and neither of these two boards would not like to have that’.”

The panel took into account the tense relations between the two neighbours. “In March 2015, there was a major terrorist attack on a police station in Jammu and Kashmir, which led to the deaths of several security personnel. In July 2015, there was another attack in Gurdaspur, Punjab which led to several security personnel and civilians losing their lives.

 

“In August 2015 there was a further incident in Udhampur in Jammu and Kashmir. Such attacks were said to have been perpetrated by Pakistan-based terrorist organisations. The PCB was well aware of the potential impact of these circumstances upon the proposed tours.”

The Dispute Resolution Committee even quoted then PCB Chairman Shaharyar Khan’s letter to Pakistan Prime Minister in 2015. “The PCB Chairman’s letter to the Pakistan Prime Minister dated 20 August 2015 stated: ‘The Indian government has seemingly withheld its permission for India to play Pakistan stating that the cricket series would be inappropriate in the current atmosphere of tension at the borders, Lakhvi’s release, Gurdaspur incidents.”

 

“Accordingly, there is a possibility that India would not agree to honour its commitment to play its series with Pakistan. His (PCB chief) pessimism was justified,” added the panel.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT