Visakhapatnam: Felling of Trees Along National Highway Sparks Outrage
Visakhapatnam is already struggling with dust and pollution. At a time when we need more greenery, chopping out of mature trees is difficult to tolerate,” said one resident, echoing the sentiment of many.
Visakhapatnam: Felling of long-standing trees In Visakhapatnam along the busy national highway stretch between Isukathota and Maddilapalem has sparked outrage among residents of these areas.
Protesting over the move, residents say these mature roadside trees had been more than just greenery. They had been a protective barrier against dust and vehicular pollution, offering shade and relief to pedestrians.
The timing of cutting the trees has intensified criticism, as the city’s Air Quality Index has recently crossed the 200 mark in several areas. Residents fear that cutting down established trees will worsen air pollution and increase health risks.
“Visakhapatnam is already struggling with dust and pollution. At a time when we need more greenery, chopping out of mature trees is difficult to tolerate,” said one resident, echoing the sentiment of many.
Adding to the frustration is what residents see as a contradiction. While civic authorities spend heavily on greening initiatives, such as seed-ball drives, they are simultaneously removing trees that have taken decades to grow and establish themselves.
Citizens have demanded immediate plantation of native species to replace the felled trees, greater transparency on the number of trees removed, and clarity on survival of trees claimed to have been translocated.
Horticulture deputy director Jaya Vasuki Chamarthi maintained that GVMC does not simply destroy trees. They shifted trees suitable for translocation to Kapuluppada and Mudasarlova, while felling only those in poor condition.
However, residents remain unconvinced. They question whether saplings or relocated trees can truly replace the environmental benefits of mature roadside trees.
The debate has reignited concerns about the city’s broader approach to green spaces. Residents argue that designated green belts serve a vital environmental purpose and should not be viewed merely as potential revenue-generating land.
“Not everything has to be seen through the lens of business. Some spaces must remain green for the benefit of citizens,” a resident remarked.
