Opinion Op Ed 21 Nov 2019 Hong Kong’s au ...

Hong Kong’s authorities have dug themselves a hole and there’s no way out

Published Nov 21, 2019, 12:36 am IST
Updated Nov 21, 2019, 12:36 am IST
Not surprisingly, the extradition bill was widely perceived as a further dilution of that promised autonomy.
Thirty years before the 1997 handover, for instance, when a labour dispute at a factory producing plastic flowers transmogrified into demonstrations and riots, the confrontation led to 51 deaths.
 Thirty years before the 1997 handover, for instance, when a labour dispute at a factory producing plastic flowers transmogrified into demonstrations and riots, the confrontation led to 51 deaths.

The Polytechnic University of Hong Kong was under siege at the time of writing, surrounded by riot police. The authorities declared that the protesters holed up on the campus, most of them students, had no option other than to surrender.

The unrest in Hong Kong, sparked some five months ago by a legislative bill that would have formalised extradition to mainland China, has since morphed into a far broader rebellion, which helps explain why the withdrawal of the offending legislation has failed to mollify the citizenry, particularly its younger components.
When Hong Kong was finally decolonised 22 years ago, the agreement under which the British colonial power handed it over to China specified “one country, two systems”, which entailed relative autonomy for the “special administrative territory” for the next 50 years.

 

Not surprisingly, the extradition bill was widely perceived as a further dilution of that promised autonomy. At the same time, factions among the protesters who have been waving the Union Jack or seeking American intervention tend to consist of those who are too young to remember the depredations of British colonialism.

Thirty years before the 1997 handover, for instance, when a labour dispute at a factory producing plastic flowers transmogrified into demonstrations and riots, the confrontation led to 51 deaths. The protesters at the time were attracted, rather than repelled, by what Peking — as it was then known — stood for.

Their identification with Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution may have been misguided, but perhaps no more so than the tendency among some of today’s revolting multitudes to look to Donald Trump or Boris Johnson as the means of salvation.

Overall, though, the thrust of the current rebellion is towards democratisation and self-determination, which militates against everything Xi Jinping stands for. The Chinese President’s attitude towards nonconformists has lately been underlined by official documents leaked to the New York Times about Beijing’s repression of Uighurs in Xinjiang province, which seeks to effectively obliterate the identity of an ethnic minority on the basis that a minuscule proportion within it strayed towards Islamist extremism.

It should hardly come as a surprise that the vast majority of Muslim nations have turned a blind eye to Chinese excesses on this front. And, among the few exceptions, Turkey can credibly be accused of hypocrisy, given its own attitude towards the Kurds.

The dastardly attitude towards the Uighurs, millions of whom have been incarcerated in “re-education” camps cannot be replicated in Hong Kong, a regional financial hub that hosts hundreds of thousands of expatriates. The idea that the territory would operate under special rules for 50 years may have seemed reasonable at a time when it was presumed that political liberalisation would accompany China’s tendency towards capitalist growth.

But Xi’s ascendancy, in particular, has shattered that presumed paradigm. The economic growth rate has lately slowed, but remains far ahead of the average in the so-called developed world. That hasn’t prevented China from throwing its weight about, including on foreign campuses where Chinese students loyal to Beijing have vociferously resisted any tendencies towards token support for the dissidents in Hong Kong.

Meanwhile, Chinese-controlled state and social media is increasingly inclined towards maligning the refuseniks as not just traitors but terrorists — in what could be seen as another reflection of the Uighur situation.

By arrangement with Dawn

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT