69th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Opinion DC Comment 28 Nov 2018 J&K: Keep all channe ...

J&K: Keep all channels open, engage Pak too

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Nov 28, 2018, 6:53 am IST
Updated Nov 28, 2018, 6:53 am IST
Mirwaiz Umar Farooq earlier this week called for a resumption of the pace of challenge to the Indian security forces.
Hurriyat Conference chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq (Photo: PTI)
 Hurriyat Conference chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq (Photo: PTI)

The news from Kashmir has been dismal in recent days. A string of major incidents in south Kashmir districts — Anantnag, Shopian, Pulwama — has seen the killings of commanders of key terrorist outfits like Hizbul Mujahideen as well as deaths of local civilians, who come to pelt stones and hamper operations, in cross-firing, besides soldiers. Tuesday also saw encounters between the security forces.

This is suggestive of the intensification of government action against terrorist outfits in areas of their concentration, but also gives us a measure of the spread and intensity of pro-terrorist sentiments that have grown very rapidly at the time of the PDP-BJP government in the state — which fell earlier in the summer — under Pakistan’s tutelage.

 

The scale of the problem is considerable, and the choices before the government can’t be easy. Seemingly conflicting courses of action have to be calibrated, reconciled, managed. For example, in the Valley, promoting conversations at the social level and with political actors of various types is vital, even as the necessity to quell the terrorism problem in some pockets looms large. Both objectives need attention.

That is no easy task. Mirwaiz Umar Farooq earlier this week called for a resumption of the pace of challenge to the Indian security forces and return to the “resistance” tempo of 2016, following the killing of a local terrorist commander that saw a sudden conflagration which brought back terrible memories of the first insurgency in the late 1980s and the early 1990s.

Isn’t there a way to openly engage the Mirwaiz, the Valley’s chief priest? While the government hesitates and takes timid steps, a former Norwegian PM has done the rounds of meeting “resistance” leaders like the Mirwaiz, and has also been in contact with political leaders in Pakistan as well as Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

Have the governments of India and Pakistan sanctioned this process as a new channel of mediation? We don’t know, and not much has come out at the formal level. However, National Conference leader Omar Abdullah has wondered how and why all this came about. What is the level of participation of J&K’s mainstream parties in this process, if indeed it is a process with which New Delhi has gone along.

It is axiomatic that conversations with Pakistan must go on, but in what way and from which forums, and within what framework? External affairs minister Sushma Swaraj had decided not to go to Pakistan for the inauguration of the Kartarpur Sahib corridor. Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh took the position that Pakistan had once again started promoting terrorist violence in his state, and had also been breaking the ceasefire on the border, killing our troops. The situation appears to be serious enough, and yet openings of conversations within Kashmir and with Pakistan have to be located.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT