Nawaz got squeezed — again — domestically, the boys got squeezed internationally and between those two confusing, seemingly unconnected things: Did FATF just save democracy in Pakistan?
Let’s start with the Nawaz stuff. For better or worse, no one has to pretend any longer that the specific chain of events is predictable or that it does not primarily have som-ething to do with the boys. Because to argue either of that would imply someone could have predicted an on-time Senate election minus PML(N) candidates. First came the Balochistan ruse. Easy enough to explain, small enough to disregard, the coup-inside-the-Assembly lulled folk into thinking the danger had been absorbed, a bullet dodged.
Phew. So that’s what they had in mind. Ok, let’s get on with the business of the rest of the elections. It drew the PML(N) into its next mistake: nominating halfway decent, relatively senatorial candidates. If the N-League had a clue what was coming next, they would have gone with Gullu Butt-types as candidates. But the PML-N made its move, nominated mostly goody-goody types, the nomination process closed, the ball left the N-League’s court and, bam! Suddenly, Nawaz is no longer N-League president and, suddenly, the N-League doesn’t have any Senate candidates. If the N-League cancels the Senate election in Punjab or tries to delay the overall Senate election by fighting it out in the courts, it will be the N-League that is fighting democratic continuity. And if the N-League elects its own candidates as Indepe-ndents, it will have to wait and see which side of the aisle the new senators choose.
The boys haven’t ventured down this path, walked us all this way, only to let Nawaz win the next election and saunter back into power. But Nawaz hasn’t come all this way, put up mystifying defiance and arrived at the threshold of a common-sense defying fourth win, just to chuck it all away. If the boys won’t back down and Nawaz can’t back down — that leaves just one option: The C-word.
Which brings us to this FATF business. Forget the specifics of what it entails and when and how. The experts may eventually tell us or, more likely, events will.
But already it is apparent that FATF is happening beca-use of the US. Committed to a military strategy in Afghanis-tan and determined to raise the cost on Pakistan for defiance, the Trump approach comes down to asking: What are the Haqqanis worth to you, Pakistan?
The answer to those questions is unknown to you and me. But for democratic purposes, it may be enough to kn-ow that the questions are being asked. FATF as a demo-nstration of the inventiveness and eagerness of the US can only mean a coup in Pakistan would give the US a straight run at Pakistan.
But for all the wailing and hysteria when the US turns the screws, there is another side. The US wants to know what the Haqqanis, LeT and Jaish are worth to us. But there are two other questions; questions few want to admit that Pakistan — the boys, essentially — has been asking of the US. The questions: What is Afghanistan worth to you, America? And what is your relationship with us — Pakistan, — worth to you?
The answers to those questions have never been good. At least not good in a democracy-chasing sense that our major political parties have wanted the answers to be.
By arrangement with Dawn
