The Indian Premier League 2020

Opinion Columnists 08 Nov 2020 Amid new dawn in the ...
Aakar Patel is a senior journalist and columnist

Amid new dawn in the US, India may now have to work differently

Published Nov 8, 2020, 4:19 am IST
Updated Nov 8, 2020, 4:19 am IST
Most Indians may not know that in April India was earmarked as a “Country of Particular Concern” by the USCIRF
Representational image
 Representational image

An American from Chennai won re-election this past week. Her name is Pramila Jayapal and she heads the Congressional Progressive Caucus. A few months ago, India’s external affairs minister S. Jaishankar cancelled a meeting with the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, which included its Republican chairman and Democratic members. Mr Jaishankar refused to meet them because the group included Pramila Jayapal, who had pushed a resolution demanding that India end the communications blackout in Kashmir. Mr Jaishankar told the Americans that he would meet them only if they dropped Ms Jayapal from the group. Of course, the Americans refused.
Mr Jaishankar is paid by us to defend India abroad but chose instead to duck the meeting as it would involve a difficult conversation or perhaps he was just afraid of a confrontation. After his running away was widely reported in the American media, Senator Kamala Harris of California had tweeted: “It’s wrong for any foreign government to tell Congress what members are allowed in meetings on Capitol Hill.”

Mr Jaishankar felt he could afford to do this as the US administration was headed by Republican Donald Trump, who doesn’t care about human rights. It will not be possible for Mr Jaishankar to do what he did in December 2019 again.
The BJP has invested a lot in doing what no other Indian government has done before -- meddle in the US elections and try and get Mr Trump elected again. A group called the “Overseas Friends of the BJP” had registered itself officially as a foreign agent in the US in September. After this was discovered, the party instructed these Indian Americans to help Mr Trump in their “personal capacity” and to not use the BJP’s name, but it is clear that they are all BJP supporters.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself asked Indians in the US to vote for Mr Trump at the “Howdy Modi” rally in September 2019. Or at least that is one interpretation we can give to his line “Ab ki baar Trump sarkar”.
What happens now that Mr Trump is on his way out? The BJP has begun backpedalling from its recklessness. It trotted out in-house intellectual Ram Madhav to write a newspaper article on Saturday that “US-India ties stand on a bipartisan and strong footing”. Mr Madhav wrote: “Some in India believe Biden-Harris would be bad news for US-India relations.”

 

Actually, nobody believes that. Mr Madhav is confusing the BJP with India. There is no question that US India relations run deep and at times there is a civilisational connect between the two nations. This is not such a time. India has taken a turn towards majoritarianism. The Indian State is bullying and harassing its own citizens at a scale which has alarmed the world.

Pramila Jayapal and Kamala Harris did not casually take up the issues they chose to. They will not stop taking them up now as the previously partisan BJP now pleads for bipartisan support.
Events in America have strengthened the hand of those leaders there who wish India well but think of India as being a collection of Indians. If Indians are mistreated, they will object.
The Democratic Party fought this election on a very liberal platform. On the question of human rights, the most powerful message they were aligned with was Black Lives Matter. This part of the Democratic Party (which includes Ms Jayapal) has become stronger inside because of the success of the human rights messaging.
Most Indians may not know that in April India was earmarked as a “Country of Particular Concern” by the US Commission on International Religious Freedom. Its report said that “India took a sharp downward turn in 2019” because the Modi government “instituted national-level policies violating religious freedom across India, especially for Muslims”. It said of the Citizenship Amendment Act that “this law is meant to provide protection for listed non-Muslim religious communities -- but not for Muslims -- against exclusion from a nationwide National Register of Citizens and the resulting detention, deportation, and potential statelessness”. It said India had seen “nationwide campaigns of harassment and violence against religious minorities to continue with impunity, and engaged in and tolerated hate speech and incitement to violence against them”.
It names home minister Amit Shah and UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath and reproduces their statements. Most important, it has recommended that the US administration act and impose “targeted sanctions on Indian government agencies and officials responsible for severe violations of religious freedom by freezing those individuals’ assets and/or barring their entry into the United States under human rights-related financial and visa authorities, citing specific religious freedom violations”.
India was able to ignore this till now because Mr Trump was running the administration and he was the one who would decide. India put out a statement that said: “We reject the observations on India in the USCIRF annual report. Its biased and tendentious comments against India are not new. But, on this occasion, its misrepresentation has reached new levels.”
This was also a form of running away. If you think you are friends with America, you have to convince them that their findings are wrong. Refusing to engage with them is not a solution. It worked when Mr Trump was in charge. It will not work now.

 

 

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT