Mohan Guruswamy | Chinas people crisis and lessons India must learn
By DECCAN CHRONICLE | Mohan Guruswamy
There is some excitement in the media over the fact that India’s population has just pipped China’s and that we are now officially the world’s most populous nation. In 1800, India’s population was at a modest 169 million. In contrast, China’s population was nearly double of that, with 322 million people at the turn of the 19th century. It wasn’t until 1950 that the total populations of both countries started shooting up exponentially. China reached the one billion milestone in 1980, while India got there in 1997.
Demographers forecast that India would overtake China in 2026, but we did better. We did it in 2023. That’s not because our growth did not slow down, but because China’s dropped faster than expected. China’s relative prosperity and its harsh one-child policy (now abandoned) had their effects.
For the first time in 60 years China’s population has fallen. Its population in 2022 — 1.4118 billion — fell by 850,000 from 2021. Its national birth rate has fallen to 6.77 births per thousand people.
Deaths have also outnumbered births for the first time in 2022 in China. It logged its highest death rate since 1976 — 7.37 deaths per 1,000 people, up from 7.18 the previous year.
China has now hit an impenetrable economic wall. The People’s Republic now has a people crisis — it has now stopped growing and is getting old. The reason is paradoxical. China’s one-child policy worked exceedingly well for it in the past. By preventing almost 400 million births since 1979, it gave the Chinese greater prosperity. It is estimated that between 1980 and 2010, the effect of a favourable population age structure accounted for between 15 per cent and 25 per cent of per capita GDP growth.
That bonus with the demographic dividend has now ended. China’s population was expected to stabilise in 2030 at 1.391 billion, moving at a slow crawl from 1.330 billion in 2010. But it has hit that spot seven years ahead. In 2050, China is projected to decline to 1.203 billion.
The flattening population and its somewhat unfavourable demographic profile has been causing concern in China for some years now.
In 2013, the Communist Party of China’s Central Committee allowed couples to have a second child if one parent was an only child. But Chinese families have got used to one-child existence. The demographic wall is not going to be crossed, and China’s workforce is not growing any more.
The Chinese leadership is now extremely concerned. Sichuan province has even announced that up to three children for a family is quite okay!
Whereas China added as many as 90 million individuals to its workforce from 2005 to 2015, in the decade from 2015, it will, at present trends, add only five million. In 2010, there were 116 million people aged 20 to 24. By 2020, the number fell by 20 per cent to 94 million. The size of the young population aged 20-24 will only be 67 million by 2030, less than 60 per cent of the figure in 2010.
One immediate consequence of this slowdown is that by 2030 the cohort aged above 60 years will increase from the present 180 million to 360 million. The other immediate economic consequence is that its savings rate will decline precipitously.
As a nation climbs the economic ladder, people inevitably live longer. But old age is also more expensive. For instance, in the United States, the old actually consume more than the rest due to medical expenses. Either they support themselves or their families have to support them. Apart from low consumption in the first few years of life, consumption is reasonably constant over the life cycle. But while income is earned and output produced, in the working life between 20 and 65 years, it is not so before and after. This ratio of working age and non-working age cohorts is called the dependency ratio.
As Indian, African and (surprise, surprise) American dependency ratios turn increasingly favourable in the coming decades, China’s will go downhill and it will join Europe and Japan as the world’s aged societies.
In comparison, in 2021, the US recorded 11.06 births per 1,000 people, and the United Kingdom, 10.08 births. The birth rate for the same year in India, which was poised to overtake China as the world’s most populous country, was 16.42.
China’s total fertility rate — the average number of children born to each woman — is among the lowest in the world, at only 1.4. In contrast, the developed world average is 1.7. China’s replacement rate — the rate at which the number of births and deaths are balanced — is 2.1, as against India’s 2.5. At purchasing power parity, China’s per capita income is just a fifth or less of other large economies. At the same time, China’s fertility level is far below that of the United States, Britain or France (all around 2.0), and is on par with those of Russia, Japan, Germany and Italy — all countries with sharply declining populations. This is a big reason why Germany so readily agreed to take about a million refugees from Syria and Libya.
Over the next 20 years, China’s ratio of workers to retirees will drop precipitously from roughly 5:1 today to just 2:1. Such a big change implies that the tax burden for each working-age person must rise by more than 150 per cent. This assumes that the government will maintain its current level of tax revenue. In addition, mounting expenditure on pensions and healthcare will put China in a difficult position. If the government demands that taxpayers pay more, the public will demand better scrutiny of how their taxes are collected and spent. This could very well open the floodgates of challenges to the Communist Party.
Can China succeed in its attempt to get out of the low growth rate cycle? The conditions now are against it. The cost of rearing a child in China has increased hugely. The State may require more children, but most families will find the costs unaffordable. This is mainly because China is now a predominantly middle-class nation.
How will this policy reversal pan out for China? Demographers offer three scenarios. The highest outcome will mean 1.43 billion in 2050, while the more plausible outcome will be between 1.35-1.37 billion. Either way, it is not going to alter the future much for China. It will become old before it becomes rich.
The writer, a policy analyst studying economic and security issues, held senior positions in government and industry. He also specialises in the Chinese economy.