Top

Trump leaves a gap; Russia & China filling it

Mr Trump believes what he is saying at any particular moment is automatically credible.

Russian President Boris Yeltsin had an excuse for his erratic behaviour. He was an uncontrollable alcoholic. US President Donald Trump has none. He is a teetotaller. Common to both of them is a loyalty to Russia. Historians examining the events of the past week will be forgiven for interpreting Mr Trump’s imperious behaviour at international summits as being an unfinished chapter from “The Decline & Fall of the US Empire”. Never since the end of the end of the Cold War has any American President so carelessly or so wantonly eroded the position of his country’s pre-eminence in global politics. Mr Trump’s first trip abroad as President looked perfect — on the drawing board. First stop: Saudi Arabia, the home of Islam. Next, Israel, the cradle of Judaism. After that, Rome, the bedrock of Roman Catholicism. And finally Sicily, the Mafia nursery. In Saudi Arabia, he received the genuflection from obsequious acolytes invited by his hosts from over 40 mainly Sunni Muslim countries. He lectured them (rather than his more culpable Saudi hosts) on the need to eradicate terrorism within their borders.

In Europe, Mr Trump told delinquent Nato members to pay up, or shut up. At a stroke, he vitiated the very premise under which Nato had been created — as a united bulwark against communism. He then shrugged off US responsibility towards a common defence — “one for one, and one for all”. In essence, he reminded them that the American motto “E pluribus Unum” may be expressed in a European language but it loses all meaning beyond the US East Coast. And in Sicily, at the G-7 meeting, he stood apart from fellow industrialised powers, creating almost overnight a new formula: G-6 +1. The final slight came when he told leaders that his decision on the Paris Agreement on climate would be conveyed to them “after a week”. German Chancellor Angela Merkel reacted with incredulity. She looked as if she been treated as a door-to-door salesperson, told to come back next week. It is a given that every leader who is new on the job (except for repeat offenders) needs time to learn the tricks. Mr Trump, however, is a ambitious Icarus without a wiser Daedalus to caution him. “For diplomacy to be effective,” his predecessor George W. Bush had once said, “words must be credible”.

Mr Trump believes what he is saying at any particular moment is automatically credible. For him diplomacy has less to do with credibility than with the power now available to him to browbeat other nations. Career diplomats are wringing their hands in despair at seeing their President uncorking US policies that have taken decades to mature. Mr Trump, like some disoriented centipede, opens his mouth only to put his other 99 feet in. Mr Trump has returned to the White House to find that he and his closest aides are under siege, not by the paparazzi but by the insidiously persistent investigations by the FBI, House Intelligence Committee and probably also the KGB. Can it be accidental that the New York Times should ask the not-so-rhetorical question: “Do we really want Mike Pence to be President?” The vacuum in this geopolitical sinkhole created by Mr Trump is being filled by Russia and by China. Russia once conquered space with its sputniks and astronauts. Today, it has mastered cyberspace. When systems collapse the first reaction in the West is to look for Russian fingerprints.

China, meanwhile, is determined not to be distracted from its ambition to be the prime superpower by 2117. Our diplomats are to be complimented for persuading Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to attend the congregations at Beijing and in Riyadh. He stood in the front line at both. Prime Minister Narendra Modi abstained from both. India may well regret that Gandhian act of self-abnegation. Has India anticipated how China’s declared plan to invest in Pakistan’s agriculture could impact the Indus Waters Treaty? That treaty weaned Pakistan off PL 480 dependence. If Pakistan were to become the granary of China, how would this affect Sino-Indian relations? There is a riparian higher than India’s Upper Riparian.

By arrangement with Dawn

( Source : Columnist )
Next Story