69th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Politics 28 Nov 2019 PMK chief hits back ...

PMK chief hits back at MK Stalin on panchami row

DECCAN CHRONICLE. | A ARUL PALANI
Published Nov 28, 2019, 2:28 am IST
Updated Nov 28, 2019, 2:28 am IST
The PMK chief had his lawyer K Balu send a stiff reply to the legal notice from Stalin's lawyer alleging defamation by Dr Ramadoss.
Dr Ramadoss.
 Dr Ramadoss.

Chennai: The allegations by rival political leaders that the DMK organ 'Murasoli' had been built on dalit 'panchami' land got louder with the PMK chief Dr S Ramadoss insisting that DMK president Stalin should produce the ownership documents as proper defence instead of serving defamation notice on him for raising the issue.

The PMK chief had his lawyer K Balu send a stiff reply to the legal notice from Stalin's lawyer alleging defamation by Dr Ramadoss. There's no defamation when truth is uttered and that too for public cause, said the PMK lawyer in his retort.
He told Stalin's lawyer R S Bharati, MP, that recent events in Tamil Nadu turned the spotlight on panchami lands and Stalin himself had tweeted that the movie 'Asuran' focusing on this issue "is not just a movie but a lesson". As there has, long been, a "consistent demand from many organisations and political parties" to restore the panchami land from Murasoli Trust to the Dalit people, Dr Ramadoss had tweeted that learning the lesson from 'Asuran' movie, Stalin should return the land.

 

PMK lawyer Balu said 'defamation' as defined under Sec 499 of IPC spoke about the crime and punishment only when the accused spoke or wrote something to deliberately harm the reputation of a person with the intention of defaming him. The provision had a clear exception-"imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published".

"The tweets made by my client are only for welfare of Dalit community and therefore they do not attract the aforesaid (Sec 499 IPC) provisions", said Balu denying the DMK chief's charge of defamation.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT