68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Other News 19 Jun 2019 No pre-arrest bail y ...

No pre-arrest bail yet for Ravi Prakash

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Jun 19, 2019, 1:17 am IST
Updated Jun 19, 2019, 1:17 am IST
With the completion of arguments, the court adjourned the cases for pronouncement of judgment without mentioning a date.
Public prosecutor C. Pratap Reddy said Prakash had falsely claimed the logo of the TV channel and fraudulently sold it to third parties without the permission of the mentors.
 Public prosecutor C. Pratap Reddy said Prakash had falsely claimed the logo of the TV channel and fraudulently sold it to third parties without the permission of the mentors.

Hyderabad: Justice Ghandikota Sri Devi of the Telangana High Court on Tuesday reserved judgment on the anticipatory bail petitions of former CEO of TV9

V. Ravi Prakash. He had asked the court to direct the Cyberabad police not to arrest him in cases lodged against him and others on charges of forgery and IT Act violations.

 

With the completion of arguments, the court adjourned the cases for pronouncement of judgment without mentioning a date.

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that Ravi Prakash would abide by the conditions imposed by the court if it gave anticipatory bail. He submitted that the state government was working against Ravi Prakash with malafide intention to favour some people.

He submitted that police was not registering the FIR based on Ravi Prakash’s complaint against the buyers of TV9. Further, he said that the transfer of 90 per cent share in TV9 was illegal, as it was transferred despite the case pending before the National Company Law Tribunal.

Public prosecutor C. Pratap Reddy said Prakash had falsely claimed the logo of the TV channel and fraudulently sold it to third parties without the permission of the mentors.

...
Location: India, Telangana, Hyderabad




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT