68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Other News 09 Sep 2016 Fresh trouble on Kri ...

Fresh trouble on Krishna: Tribunal verdict challenged by riparian states

Published Sep 9, 2016, 2:21 am IST
Updated Sep 9, 2016, 7:18 am IST
As per indications, all the four riparian states are separately planning to challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court.
Krishna river
 Krishna river

Hyderabad: The extended Krishna Tribunal on Thursday reserved its orders to determine whether the fresh allocation of Krishna waters as stated in Section 89 of the AP Reorganisation Act was applicable to TS and AP or was to be extended to all four riparian states including Karnataka and Maharashtra.

Arguments over the controversial issue by all the four riparian states as well as Centre concluded on Thursday and Justice Brijesh Kumar, chairman of the Krishna Tribunal, announced that it would deliver the verdict in three weeks. As per indications, all the four riparian states are separately planning to challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court.


After repeated reminders, the Centre submitted before the Tribunal that Section 89 of the bifurcation Act would only apply to TS and AP. The Reorganisation Act states the Krishna Tribu-nal would be extended to decide on distribution of Krishna waters among the states. There was no clarity on whether it was applicable to AP and TS or all the four states.

The Justice Brijesh Kumar Tribunal had earlier announced a final award replacing the Bachawat Award and had made allocations of Krishna waters to Karnataka, Maharashtra and united AP in 2013. The Supreme Court, on a Special Leave Petition filed by the then AP government, had stayed publication of notification. The stay is still in place.

After bifurcation, TS had filed a complaint with the extended tribunal for a review of its award, claiming it had been discriminated against since the formation of AP in 1956.

The residuary AP government had also sought a review of the award alleging that justice was not done to it. It said Karnataka and Maharashtra were given en bloc allotments in Krishna while undivided AP was denied the same.

Maharashtra and Karnataka had moved the Tribunal stating that it should allot water to the two Telugu states only from allotment made to united AP, and should not drag them into the fresh distribution plea since everything had been decided by the Tribunal in 2013.

Almost two and a half years later, on Thursday, all the four state governments and the Centre concluded their replies, counters and arguments before the Tribunal.

Now the question before the Tribunal whose verdict is considered equal to a Supreme Court judgement, is whether Section 89 of AP Reorganisation Act will apply to two or four states.

According to sources, if it decides it is confined to the two Telugu states, both states will challenge it in the apex court. In case the Tribunal states that it is applicable to four states and orders for a review of water allocation, Karnataka and Maharashtra will approach the apex court.

Location: India, Telangana, Hyderabad