67th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra62228269972098 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat159448611980 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh76454410334 Uttar Pradesh74454215201 West Bengal48131775302 Bihar3359120915 Andhra Pradesh3330223460 Karnataka278189448 Telangana2256134567 Punjab2197194942 Jammu and Kashmir216487528 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala11515659 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chandigarh3641894 Chhatisgarh364830 Tripura2421650 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa68370 Puducherry49170 Meghalaya20121 Nagaland1800 Manipur540 Arunachal Pradesh210 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 29 Mar 2016 Madras High Court fr ...

Madras High Court frowns on loudspeakers at religious places

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Mar 29, 2016, 3:34 am IST
Updated Mar 29, 2016, 6:27 am IST
The Bench directed the authorities to immediately carry out inspection of all religious places.
The Bench was passing orders on a PIL from S. Kumarvelu, a social worker.
 The Bench was passing orders on a PIL from S. Kumarvelu, a social worker.

Chennai: Castigating the practice of using horn-type loud speakers (funnel-type) at religious places of various religions, causing noise pollution, the Madras high court observed, “It appears that these institutions (places of worship of different faiths) perceive that the blessing of God cannot be obtained unless there is loud noise. Prayers for all religions have been going on from ancient time even when electricity did not exist”.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M.M. Sundresh directed the authorities to immediately carry out inspection of all these places and ensure action against noise pollution.

 

The Bench was passing orders on a PIL from S. Kumarvelu, a social worker, which sought a direction to the authorities to implement the order passed by the Supreme Court way back in 2005, restricting the use of horn type loud speakers in its letter and spirit in order to control the noise pollution.

In its order, the bench said government pleader submitted that there were proceedings even before the National Green Tribunal regarding the issue.

It was also stated that if any complaint was preferred against noise pollution, action will be initiated against the organisers of the concerned place without any deviation, as communicated to them by the DGP (through a letter dated March 28, 2016).

The letter also states that while permitting any programme or function, police officials were ensuring that no horn speaker was used and that any speaker used was within the decibel level prescribed by the government and any deviation in this will lead to registration of case and seizure of the particular horn speaker.

On the other hand, counsel for the petitioner has now given specific examples of at least 44 places where the horn type speakers were being used and decibel levels were being crossed.

Unfortunately, they all relate to religious places of different religions. It appears that these institutions perceive that the blessing of God cannot be obtained unless there was loud noise. The prayers for all religions have been going on from ancient time even when electricity did not exist.

“We see no reason why in view of the categorical judgment of the SC, which is now eleven years old, there should be any violation whatsoever. More than enough time has elapsed for implementation. The respondents (authorities) are directed to file the compliance report before the court, the Bench added.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT