65th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra56948179181897 Tamil Nadu185459909136 Delhi152577264303 Gujarat152057549938 Rajasthan79474566178 Madhya Pradesh72613927313 Uttar Pradesh69913991182 West Bengal41921578289 Andhra Pradesh3245213359 Bihar300680014 Karnataka249379347 Punjab2106191840 Telangana2098132163 Jammu and Kashmir192185426 Odisha16608877 Haryana138183818 Kerala10885558 Assam832884 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chandigarh3641894 Chhatisgarh364830 Tripura2421650 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa68370 Puducherry49170 Meghalaya20121 Nagaland1800 Manipur540 Arunachal Pradesh210 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 28 Jun 2016 Hyderabad forum asks ...

Hyderabad forum asks Airtel to disclose the names of cops seeking call data records

DECCAN CHRONICLE. | U SUDHAKAR REDDY
Published Jun 28, 2016, 2:56 am IST
Updated Jun 28, 2016, 7:03 am IST
Cops seeking call data must be identified.
The complainant asked Airtel for details of those who had obtained his call list. The company refused.
 The complainant asked Airtel for details of those who had obtained his call list. The company refused.

Hyderabad: The Hyderabad District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-2 has ruled in favour of a cell phone user and ordered service provider Airtel to disclose the names of those who had asked for his call data records.

The Forum gave the ruling in a case pertaining to an inspector of police with the Railway Protection Force, Mr I. Vijaya Kumar, a resident of Domalaguda, after Airtel refused to divulge the details of persons who had asked for his call data records.

 

The police department had used Mr Kumar’s call data as evidence against him in a departmental disciplinary proceedings case.

The consumer forum judgment has gained significance in view of police authorities obtaining CDR (call data records) often from mobile phone operators without the consent of the user.

The complainant had alleged in the petition that he had been provided with a Common User Group (CUG) mobile number by the department for departmental and private use.

"The complainant used the mobile number provided to him from April, 2011 to June, 2012. He had to face certain disciplinary charges and was transferred to Khajipet and hence handed over the phone to the department. The departmental authorities obtained call list particulars from Airtel and used the same as a prosecution document against him,” said sources.

The complainant asked Airtel for details of those who had obtained his call list. The company refused.

Airtel said that the forum had no jurisdiction to decide on the complaint since as per previous judgments, disputes between a subscriber and the telegraph authority could only be resolved by taking recourse to arbitration proceedings. However, the forum ruled that the acts of the opposite party were “deficiency of service” or “unfair trade practices” and ordered Airtel to provide the details of those who had sought the call list of the complainant and also to pay Rs 10,000 compensation towards mental agony and Rs 2000 towards costs.

...
Location: India, Telangana, Hyderabad




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT