68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 28 Jan 2020 EU move casts shadow ...

EU move casts shadow on PM Modi’s Brussels visit

Published Jan 28, 2020, 1:52 am IST
Updated Jan 28, 2020, 1:52 am IST
A debate on CAA is scheduled for January 29 in the European Parliament.
Trinamul Mohila Congress activists celebrate after a resolution was passed against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in its Assembly in Kolkata on Monday. (PTI)
 Trinamul Mohila Congress activists celebrate after a resolution was passed against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in its Assembly in Kolkata on Monday. (PTI)

New Delhi: The debate in the European Parliament on India's Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), scheduled for January 29 followed by a vote the next day, may trigger uncertainty over Prime Minister Narendra Modi's proposed visit to the Belgian capital Brussels for the India-European Union (EU) Summit later this year, sources hinted on Monday. The sources also sought to highlight that individually, European nations like France strongly back the Indian government’s stand that the CAA is an internal matter of India.

According to reports, a total of six resolutions have been tabled by six groups comprising 559 members in the 751-member European Parliament. Most of the resolutions are critical of the CAA, while some also criticise the implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam and the security lockdown and detentions in Jammu and Kashmir.


The most critical reportedly is the resolution moved by the S&D Group, the second largest group with 154 MEPs, which states that the CAA has the potential to “create the largest statelessness crisis in the world.” The resolution by the EPP Group, the largest with 182 MEPs, says the law could have negative consequences for “India’s international image and internal stability.”

French diplomatic sources in Delhi said France — a founding member of the EU — is of the view that the CAA is “India’s internal matter” and that the “European Parliament is an institution independent of member states and the European Commission,” indicating that there may be a rift within the European Bloc on the matter. The European Parliament is the legislative wing of the EU while the European Commission is the EU’s executive wing.

Union law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad indicated on Monday that the ministry of external affairs (MEA) will explain to the members of European Parliament about the CAA but also took a jibe at it, asking why its members hadn’t raised the issue of victimisation of Hindus in Pakistan.

Though no dates have been announced, it had been speculated that PM Modi may visit Brussels in March this year, but the anti-CAA resolution in the European Parliament may put a spanner in the works.

With reports that the European Parliament is set to debate and vote on the resolutions, some of which state that the CAA marks a “dangerous shift” in the India’s citizenship regime and has “created the legal grounds to strip millions of Muslims of the fundamental right of equal access to citizenship,” Indian government sources had said on Sunday that, “The European Union Parliament should not take actions that call into question the rights and authority of democratically elected legislatures in other regions of the world.”

Hoping that “sponsors and supporters of the draft will engage with us to get a full and accurate assessment of the facts before they proceed further,” Indian government sources had further said that “every society that fashions a pathway to naturalisation, contemplates both a context and criteria (and that) this is not discrimination,” further claiming that “European societies have followed the same approach.”

Government sources had further said that the CAA is a “matter entirely internal to India” and that this legislation has been adopted by due process and through democratic means after a public debate in both Houses of Parliament.”