70th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra70013301082362 Tamil Nadu2349513170187 Delhi208348746523 Gujarat17217107801063 Rajasthan91006213199 Uttar Pradesh83615030222 Madhya Pradesh82835003358 West Bengal57722306325 Bihar3945174123 Andhra Pradesh3676237464 Karnataka3408132852 Telangana2792149188 Jammu and Kashmir260194631 Haryana2356105521 Punjab2301200044 Odisha210412459 Assam14862854 Kerala132760811 Uttarakhand9592225 Jharkhand6612965 Chhatisgarh5481211 Tripura4231730 Himachal Pradesh3401186 Chandigarh2972144 Manipur83110 Puducherry79250 Goa73500 Nagaland4300 Meghalaya28121 Arunachal Pradesh2010 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 26 Mar 2019 Suspension of nearly ...

Suspension of nearly 6k lawyers: MHAA moves Madras High Court

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Mar 26, 2019, 4:34 am IST
Updated Mar 26, 2019, 4:34 am IST
A member who was in arrears for 3 consecutive years shall stand removed from the scheme automatically.
Madras High Court
 Madras High Court

Chennai: The Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHAA) has approached the Madras high court, challenging the order of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, whereby the right of practice of 5,970 advocates has been suspended allegedly for non payment of subscription for the Advocates Welfare Fund.

The petition filed by the MHAA by its secretary R.Krishnakumar is likely to come up for hearing tomorrow. On Monday, the MHAA president G.Mohanakrishnan made an mention before Chief Justice V.K.Tahilramani to permit the MHAA to file a petition against the suspension of 5,970 advocates  by the BCTP and to hear the matter early.

 

In his petition, Krishnakumar submitted that this petition was filed challenging the validity of the Notice dated March 22 issued by the BCTP, whereby the right of practice of 5, 970 advocates in any court, Tribunal or other Authority has been suspended in an unreasonable and arbitrary manner. The suspension was ostensibly for non-payment of subscription for the Advocates Welfare Fund under the Bar Council of India Advocates Welfare Scheme. It was stated that the suspension would continue till payment of subscription under Rule 40 of the BCI Rules in terms of Resolution dated March 21, 2019, he added.

He said the BCI Advocates Welfare Scheme envisages a welfare fund to which every advocate enrolled was entitled to become a member by submitting an application and paying an admission fee and subscription. A member who was in arrears for 3 consecutive years shall stand removed from the scheme automatically. As such, membership of the scheme was voluntary subject to payment of subscription. If any advocate either fails to apply to join this scheme or his/her admission was refused or fails to pay subscription, she/he would not be entitled to claim any benefits under the scheme.

If any advocate fails to pay the amount, a committee of 3 members constituted by the state bar council may pass an order of suspension after the secretary issues a show cause notice. However, the impugned order has been passed without adequate notice and without proper reasons. Moreover, the membership of Advocates Welfare Fund was voluntary and non payment of fee or subscription would entail loss of benefits under this scheme. But suspension from practice for such non-payment was antithetical to the nature of scheme, he added and sought to stay the operation of the order.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT