74th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra80229286942849 Tamil Nadu2869415762235 Delhi2633410315708 Gujarat19119130111190 Rajasthan100847359218 Uttar Pradesh97335648257 Madhya Pradesh89965878384 West Bengal73032912366 Karnataka4835169357 Bihar4598223329 Andhra Pradesh4250256573 Haryana3597120924 Telangana32901627113 Jammu and Kashmir3142104835 Odisha247814819 Punjab2415204347 Assam19894434 Kerala170071215 Uttarakhand115328610 Jharkhand7642975 Chhatisgarh6781892 Tripura6221730 Himachal Pradesh3691636 Chandigarh3022225 Goa126570 Manipur124110 Puducherry90330 Nagaland8000 Arunachal Pradesh3710 Meghalaya33131 Mizoram1710 Sikkim200
Nation Current Affairs 26 Mar 2019 Madras High Court: F ...

Madras High Court: Follow procedure in filing complaint against concerned

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Mar 26, 2019, 4:20 am IST
Updated Mar 26, 2019, 4:20 am IST
Vehemently opposing the plea, State Public Prosecutor A.Natarajan submitted that the petition was not maintainable.
Madras High Court
 Madras High Court

Chennai: Declining to entertain a petition, which sought a direction to the DGP to register a complaint against the Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore and the Additional Chief Secretary for allegedly revealing the name of the victim in Pollachi sexual scandal, the Madras high court has granted liberty to an advocate to approach the Magistrate court concerned for appropriate relief.Justice G.K.Illanthiraiyan while passing orders on a petition filed by advocate

A.P.Suryaprakasam, asked him to follow the usual procedure and gave liberty to him to approach the high court, if he is so aggrieved with the order likely to be passed by the Magistrate concerned.

 

When the petition came up for hearing on Monday, M.Purushothaman, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the right to privacy of the girl is affected in this case. The complaint of advocate Suryaprakasam relate to the Pollachi sex scandal, where the name of the victim girl was revealed. Pandiya Rajan, the Superintendent of police, in a press interview, revealed the name of the victim girl. Similarly, the Additional Chief Secretary Niranjan Mardi in the government order dated March 13 clearly revealed the name of the victim girl and also the name of the college, which was against the order of the Supreme Court, he added.

Vehemently opposing the plea, State Public Prosecutor A.Natarajan submitted that the petition was not maintainable. The petitioner has to follow the procedure laid down in a judgment passed by a division bench of this court. The petitioner has to approach the police first with a complaint, thereafter he has to approach the Magistrate concerned by preferring a complaint under section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. Without following these procedures, the petitioner has approached this court straightaway. Therefore, the petition was not maintainable. Moreover, an FIR was registered against the persons who involved in the scandal. Disciplinary proceeding has been initiated against the officer, who revealed the name of the victim. Already the state government has referred the investigation to the CBI, which is still pending, Natarajan added.

Concurring with his submission, the judge asked the petitioner to follow the procedure.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT