Nation Current Affairs 22 Mar 2016 Chief Minister didn& ...

Chief Minister didn't seek my resignation, says Maharashtra Advocate General

Published Mar 22, 2016, 3:14 pm IST
Updated Mar 22, 2016, 3:14 pm IST
I considered it my Constitutional duty to place the interest of the people above the interest of the government.
Advocate General of Maharashtra Shrihari Aney (Photo: Video grab)
 Advocate General of Maharashtra Shrihari Aney (Photo: Video grab)

Mumbai: Shrihari Aney, who resigned as Advocate General of Maharashtra this morning after a row over his remarks on separate Marathwada state, said that he had quit on his own and was not asked to do so by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis.

"Let me make it clear that neither His Excellency the Governor nor the Honourable Chief Minister asked me for my resignation," Aney said in a statement.


There are two reasons for my resignation. The first has to do with conflict of duty. The second concerns institutional stability. As to the first reason, I firmly believe that the Advocate General is the first lawyer of the people of the state. The Advocate General is not a Government Pleader."

Based on this belief, as Advocate General, I considered it my Constitutional duty to place the interest of the people above the interest of the governmental machinery.

This was most visible in my arguments in matters concerning lack of development of Vidarbha, the insistence on the right of people of Marathwada to drinking water, and the need for stronger governmental measures to tackle the issue of farmers' suicides and the state's agrarian crisis," Aney said.


"My submissions leading to withdrawal of the state's resolution regarding sedition, and the right of women to enter places of religious worship are further illustrations of placing the interest of the people uppermost," he said.

Such arguments might have caused discomfort to the state, but they did result in orders of the High Court which directly benefited the neediest and most deprived sections of the public. In that, I find a complete vindication of the office of the Advocate General," he said.

"The second reason is of institutional stability. In spite of the fact that my stand on Vidarbha's statehood is well known, it became the reason for disruption of the State's Legislature for two weeks in the winter session," he said.


I first declared my support to Marathwada's statehood cause over a month ago at a public function at Ahmednagar. I reiterated it three days ago at Jalna. I have written more elaborately about the Jalna speech in a separate post on Facebook," he said.

"Once again a section of the honourable legislators have chosen to make this as an issue to stall the present budget session. As a lawyer I am aware that the failure of the budget session has the result of fall of the ruling government.

"It would perhaps have been better if the legislators had deliberated over the problems that occasion the demand for statehood and made some attempt to solve them. Shooting the messenger does not solve the problem," he said.


In the present disruption of the Legislature, I see a clear pattern. Since I shall not stop from voicing my demand for Vidarbha's statehood, and the legislators will not stop from using it as a ready excuse to stall the working of the Legislature, one of us has to step back," he said.

In keeping with my belief that the Advocate General's prime function is to protect the interest of the people, and that the Legislature must function if the interest of the people is to be protected, my final act as Advocate General which would be most in the interest of the people of the state was to resign the post," Aney said.