Nation Current Affairs 19 Jun 2019 Madras High Court sl ...

Madras High Court slams favouritism, orders exam

PTI
Published Jun 19, 2019, 5:36 am IST
Updated Jun 19, 2019, 5:36 am IST
The Madras High Court on Tuesday directed the government to conduct written examinations to select eligible candidates.
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
 Madurai Bench of Madras High Court

Madurai: Overhauling the recruitment process for Grade IV posts in Tamil Nadu to weed out favouritism and bring in transparency, the Madras High Court on Tuesday directed the government to conduct written examinations to select eligible candidates.

Disposing of a plea filed by a man waiting unsuccessfully for 13 years for a job after registering in the Employment Exchange, Justice S M Subramaniam at the Madurai Bench of the HC regretted that it was common knowledge that all Grade IV appointments were made on the grounds of favouritism-posts such as sweeper, gardener, village and office assistants fall under Grade IV.   

 

The petitioner, P Udhayakumar, submitted that while he has been waiting for a job for over a decade now, another man related to an executive officer got appointed even though he was a junior on the employment waiting list.   If public servants are appointed based on favouritism, "how can the people of this great nation expect integrity and honesty from such a public servant", the judge asked with deep concern.   

"If a public servant is appointed by way of influence or with the help of politicians, how can the people expect such a person to maintain self-respect in society and serve the people," he wondered.  

Coming out against providing appointments at whims and fancies of the executive or under the influence of politicians, the judge said the question was about maintaining institutional integrity and honesty.

"Transparency is also an elementary principle to be followed for the purpose of free and fair selection to the public posts," he said.

 Appointments to Grade IV posts should be made only by conducting written examinations and interview marks should not exceed 15 per cent of the total, the judge said, negating the present practice of taking into account only the marks scored in the interview. Eighty-five per cent marks should be divided for the written exam and must cover other eligibility criteria, he said, adding that a merit list should then be prepared and the selection and appointment should be made in accordance to that and following the rules of reservation.

The court has directed the Chief Secretary to issue instructions on the selection process for Grade IV posts across the state for all departments to streamline appointments and bring in uniformity and transparency. The district collectors, who play a pivotal role in Grade IV appointments, are bound to ensure that selections are done in consonance with the Constitution scheme of things, doing justice to the unemployed, poor and down-trodden.   Though the petitioner had sought quashing the appointment of the man who was his junior on the wait list, the judge declined it, holding that he was in the job for eight years and the need was that of regulation of appointments.

(With PTI report)

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT