New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stepped in to save the embarrassment caused to Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur by a suo motu judicial order passed by Justice C.S. Karnan of the Madras high court “staying” the recommendation for his transfer as a judge of the Calcutta high court on February 12.
Taking note of submissions by senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for the registrar-general of the Madras high court on Justice Karnan’s action, a bench of Justices J.S. Khehar and R. Banumathi said “the operation of all or any administrative/judicial order(s) passed by Justice C.S. Karnan, after the issuance of the proposal of his transfer from the Madras hC dated 12.02.2016 (unless specially assigned to him, by the chief justice of the high court), shall remain stayed till further orders.”
Read: India is a racist nation; I am ashamed to be born here: Justice CS Karnan
The bench said it will be open to the hC chief justice not to assign any further administrative/judicial work to him. This would imply that no other orders shall be passed by Justice Karnan, suo motu or otherwise, in any matter not specially assigned to him.
Earlier Mr Venugopal presented an affidavit by B. Hari, registrar-cum-private secretary to the Madras HC chief justice dated 14.02.2016 saying Justice Karnan had orally stayed the transfer order and the written order will be issued Monday.
He also drew the court’s attention to various suo motu orders passed by Justice Karnan in the past few days.
Initially the bench did not stay Justice Karnan’ s suo motu order but only asked the hC chief justice not to assign him any work. It said a copy of this order shall be furnished to Justice C.S. Karnan by the HC registrar-general.
All orders by Karnan stayed
But in the afternoon a copy of the order was submitted to the bench, that updated the order and stayed all orders by Justice Karnan after February 12.
The bench said: “A perusal of the affidavit reveals Justice C.S. Karnan has received the proposal of his transfer from the High Court of Madras dated 12.02.2016. Having taken note of the situation, in our view it would be appropriate that Justice C.S. Karnan should hear and dispose of only such matters as are specially assigned to him by the CJ of the Madras HC.”
Earlier, in his suo motu order, Justice Karnan referred to the communication on his transfer and said: “It is beyond my comprehension to discern Your Lordship’s comment on better administration and would suggest that Your Lordship refer to the (decision of the) nine-judge bench of the apex court delivered in 1993. Your Lordship’s proposal of transfer goes against this judgment. Your Lordship’s order is indicative of being an administrative order.”
