142nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra54831338184318650 Tamil Nadu3145202563135278 Andhra Pradesh2641421709242378 Karnataka1964941126333511 Delhi1494601343184167 Uttar Pradesh140775887862280 West Bengal98459671202059 Telangana8647563074665 Bihar8274154139450 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3811424922127 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland30119738 Arunachal Pradesh223115923 Chandigarh1595100425 Meghalaya11154986 Sikkim9105101 Mizoram6203230
Nation Current Affairs 14 Apr 2016 HC urged to let witn ...

HC urged to let witnesses swear in name of Constitution, not God

PTI
Published Apr 14, 2016, 8:16 pm IST
Updated Apr 14, 2016, 8:19 pm IST
As per Oath Act, 1969, any person who deposes in the court, can swear in the name of God or by placing hands on a religious book.
Bombay High Court (Photo: PTI)
 Bombay High Court (Photo: PTI)

Mumbai: Two petitions have been filed in Bombay High Court seeking liberty to people who practise "atheism" to take oath in the name of Constitution in the courts, instead of swearing in the name of God.

Currently, as per Oath Act, 1969, a witness or any person who deposes in the court, can swear in the name of God or by placing hands on a religious book.

In a PIL, a Pune-based couple, Sunil Mane and his wife Laxmikanta, cited a couple of cases in Maharashtra at Bhivandi Magistrate Court and Pune District Court wherein senior government officials have told the court that they do not believe in God and expressed their willingness to take oath in the name of Constitution but unfortunately they have not been permitted, the PIL said.

In another petition, an officer of Bhiwandi Municipal Corporation has made a similar plea.

Both the petitions are slated to come up for hearing in due course, High Court sources said.

"The Oaths Act, 1969, needs to be declared as violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution," the Pune-based couple said in the PIL.

They urged the court to issue directions to the Union and state governments that persons who are not willing to take oath in the name of God or by putting their hands on any religious book should be allowed to take oath in the name of Indian Constitution.

"People who are not believers of God but have full faith in the Indian Constitution are getting denial during judicial proceedings at various levels in Maharashtra when they request that they be administered oath in the name of Indian Constitution," the PIL said.

"It is high time to make the oath system suitable to democracy and in accordance with the spirit of Indian Constitution," the PIL states.

Advocate Asim Sarode, through whom the PIL has been filed, said, "People, who are non-believers of God, are not allowed to swear in the name of Indian Constitution or placing hands on the rule book."

He said that a person of any religion would not have objection to taking oath in the name of Constitution as it is his or her duty to abide by the Constitution.

"This will help avoid flaring of communal thoughts and feelings and it will also not create problems for people who are atheists," Sarode added.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT