65th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra56948179181897 Tamil Nadu185459909136 Delhi152577264303 Gujarat152057549938 Rajasthan79474566178 Madhya Pradesh72613927313 Uttar Pradesh69913991182 West Bengal41921578289 Andhra Pradesh3245213359 Bihar300680014 Karnataka249379347 Punjab2106191840 Telangana2098132163 Jammu and Kashmir192185426 Odisha16608877 Haryana138183818 Kerala10885558 Assam832884 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chandigarh3641894 Chhatisgarh364830 Tripura2421650 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa68370 Puducherry49170 Meghalaya20121 Nagaland1800 Manipur540 Arunachal Pradesh210 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 13 Apr 2018 SC/ST verdict led to ...

SC/ST verdict led to great damage: Centre

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Apr 13, 2018, 1:01 am IST
Updated Apr 13, 2018, 1:01 am IST
Centre tells Supreme Court that its recent judgement on the SC/ST Act has diluted the provisions of the law.
Supreme Court
 Supreme Court

New Delhi: The Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that its ruling on the SC/ST Act that no arrests can be made under it without a prior probe had led to “great damage” to the country and sought a review and recall of its order. On April 3, while the court refused to stay the directions on arrest, it asked attorney-general K.K. Venugopal to spell out the reasons as to why the government was opposing the verdict. 

On April 3, while the court refused to stay the directions on arrest, it asked attorney-general K.K. Venugopal to spell out the reasons through “written submissions” as to why the government was opposing the verdict. The A-G accordingly filed a detailed response. Referring to the directions, the Centre said the case dealing with an issue of very sensitive nature has caused a lot of commotion in the country and was also creating anger, unease and a sense of disharmony.

 

It faulted the court for resorting to judicial legislation, when no such power existed. It said this judgment had diluted the provisions of the SC/ST Atrocities Act, read with the Criminal Procedure Code, resulting in great damage to the country. 

It said when it was Parliament’s mandate to grant protection to Dalits against atrocities, there was no reason for the court to dilute this and act contrary to the provisions. The government noted that the police officer on registration of an FIR was bound to effect the arrest, but he will now be compelled not to arrest the accused and any violation will result in contempt. The confusion created by the judgment, it was submitted, deserves to be corrected. 

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT