70th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra72300313332465 Tamil Nadu2458613706200 Delhi221329243556 Gujarat17632118941092 Rajasthan92716267201 Uttar Pradesh83615030222 Madhya Pradesh82835003358 West Bengal61682410364 Bihar3945174123 Andhra Pradesh3791241464 Karnataka3408132852 Telangana2891152692 Jammu and Kashmir260194631 Haryana2356105521 Punjab2301200044 Odisha210412459 Assam14862854 Kerala132760811 Uttarakhand9592225 Jharkhand6612965 Chhatisgarh5481211 Tripura4231730 Himachal Pradesh3401186 Chandigarh2972144 Manipur83110 Puducherry79250 Goa73500 Nagaland4300 Meghalaya28121 Arunachal Pradesh2010 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 12 Apr 2016 Ayyappa celibate, ar ...

Ayyappa celibate, argues counsel

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Apr 12, 2016, 12:54 am IST
Updated Apr 12, 2016, 12:54 am IST
The bench said it will strike a balance between the right to equality and right to religious freedom.
The arguments will continue on Wednesday.
 The arguments will continue on Wednesday.

New Delhi: A three-judge bench of Justices Dipak Misra, V. Gopala Gowda and Kurian Joseph of the Supreme Court on Monday strongly denounced the religious custom barring the entry of women.

The bench said it will strike a balance between the right to equality and right to religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion to every individual.

 

Senior counsel  K.K. Venugopal, appearing for the Devaswom Board, said for several centuries traditionally  it had been a practice in the temple located in a forest area to restrict the entry of women in the 10-50 age group as the deity, Lord Ayyappa, was a “Naisthik  brahmachari” celibate.

He said male devotees take a vow of celibacy for 42 days, avoid smoking and liquor and  walk barefoot through the jungles to perform pooja. Justice Misra asked the counsel: “Is it (ban) so intricately fundamental for religion as envisaged by the Constitution? Is spirituality singularly in the domain of men and women? Are women incapable of attaining spirituality?”

Senior counsel K.K.. Venugopal argued the tradition has been continuing for centuries and there were several books and research works to support such beliefs. He said that this practice was not discrimination against women.

Senior counsel K. Parasaran, appearing for Nair Society, one of the intervenors, said Sabaraimala was a unique temple where besides Hindus, Christians, Muslims and even foreigners were allowed entry. But as per custom and long tradition, women between 10 and 50 were not allowed as the manifestation of God in this temple was celibate.

He said not only the perceptions of worshippers but what was being worshipped was also important. If a devotee felt he was not worshipping the idol of a brahmachari, he may not go to that temple. In all other Ayyappa temples in Kerala, women are allowed entry without discrimination.

The concept is that the presence of women between 10 and 50 will disturb the penance of Lord Ayyappa. At this juncture, Justice Misra told the counsel: “To accept your argument we must constitutionally reconcile that such a prohibition is permissible. What we are saying is can you deny a class of people within a class on biological reasons, and thereby infringe my (women) right to practice religion,
which includes the right to enter temples.”

Senior counsel Ravi Prakash Gupa, appearing for the Indian Young Lawyers’ Association, strongly opposed the ban. He recalled the recent Bombay high court order that allowed the entry of women into the Shani temple, that ended a 400-year tradition, and said judicial intervention was required here too. The arguments will continue on Wednesday.

 

...
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT