112th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra26992414450710482 Tamil Nadu142798925672032 Delhi113740913123411 Gujarat42808298062056 Karnataka4158116249759 Uttar Pradesh3813024203955 Telangana3622123679365 West Bengal3144819213956 Andhra Pradesh3110316464365 Rajasthan2493618630518 Haryana2192916637308 Madhya Pradesh1820713208653 Assam178081141741 Bihar1742112364125 Odisha13737925591 Jammu and Kashmir108276095179 Kerala8323425732 Punjab81785586199 Chhatisgarh4265320219 Jharkhand3963235131 Uttarakhand3608285647 Goa2583154014 Tripura209314752 Manipur16269700 Puducherry146878518 Himachal Pradesh124392710 Nagaland8453400 Chandigarh5884238 Arunachal Pradesh3871452 Meghalaya316462 Mizoram2331510 Sikkim166870
Nation Current Affairs 07 Sep 2019 Provide police prote ...

Provide police protection to fence archaeological site: Madras high court

DECCAN CHRONICLE. | J STALIN
Published Sep 7, 2019, 2:32 am IST
Updated Sep 7, 2019, 2:32 am IST
Justice N. Kirubakaran gave the directive while dealing with the matter relating to archaeological site at Pallavaram.
Madras high court
 Madras high court

Chennai: Directing the Tamil Nadu government to provide necessary police protection to the ASI officials and other workers for fencing the pre-historical archaeological site at Pallavaram, the Madras high court has posed three queries to the Union government, which included the one why not the ASI appoint more epigraphists in Tamil language, since most of the stone inscriptions in India are found to be in Tamil and epigraphists in other languages as per their requirement.

Justice N. Kirubakaran gave the directive while dealing with the matter relating to archaeological site at Pallavaram.

 

Suo motu impleading the director, Epigraphists Branch, Archaeological Survey of India, Mysore, as a party, the judge said assistant solicitor general G.Karthikeyan has taken notice on behalf of the newly impleaded party and undertaken to get reply for the queries.

The other two queries posed by the judge are: Why not the ASI start a epigraphists branch at Chennai and why not the ASI transfer all the artefacts and Tamil inscriptions to Chennai.

The judge said it was represented by ASG as well as the ASI officials who were present before this court that when the ASI officials along with the workers went to the pre-historical archaeological site at Pallavaram for fencing the area which were not so far encroached upon, there was a vehement opposition by the local people and in spite of police protection, the ASI officials were unable to carry out their work. Even on earlier
occasion, when a joint survey was sought to be conducted, there was opposition by the local people and only with the aid of the police protection the survey could be completed and the most of the people in the locality were assured that their possession of properties would not be disturbed.

 

Further, only a few extents of properties alone remain unoccupied and therefore, they have to be protected by fencing. Further  more, out of the six patches of archaeological site, one patch was already successfully fenced by using MS Steel grills and the rest of the lands need to be fenced. Advocate General Narmada Sampath and SGP T.M.Pappiah assured before this court that proper police protection would be provided so that fencing could be done by the ASI officials at the earliest, the judge added.

The judge said with regard to the usage of ground penetrating radar system to find out the artefacts beneath the ground, it was represented by the ASI officials that the said lands need to be necessarily fenced before using the technology. He reiterated that even if artefacts were not found, the said area needs to be preserved and protected. Therefore, the Deputy Commissioner of Police, St Thomas Mount,  was directed to provide appropriate police protection to the ASI officials and workers to fence the identified areas and file a report before this court, the judge added.

 

The judge said it was also reported in a Tamil newspaper dated August 27, 2019, that copying of the stone inscription was done earlier by the British administration and it was originally preserved in Madras and thereafter at Ooty and presently shifted to Mysore. Even as per the details provided in the ASI website, the majority of the stone inscriptions found in India was in Tamil. Further, it was brought to the knowledge of this court that only two Tamil epigraphists were working in Mysore and they were unable to digitalize the inscriptions and in spite of request made by the Tamil Nadu government, there was no proper response from the Epigraphist branch at Mysore.

 

Further, the copies taken from stone inscriptions have to revalidated or digitalized within 75 years or else they would be destroyed. Therefore, to safeguard the original copies taken from stone inscriptions they have to necessarily be digitalized and the officials were to get instructions with regard to employment of more Tamil epigraphists on contract basis, so that the work could be completed on time, Further the ASI officials also need to get instructions as to when the copies taken from stone inscriptions would be transferred as per the request of the Tamil Nadu government, the judge added and posted to September 25, further hearing of the case.

 

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT