68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 07 Jun 2019 No meetings or prote ...

No meetings or protests allowed on Marina: Madras high court

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Jun 7, 2019, 2:52 am IST
Updated Jun 7, 2019, 2:57 am IST
The court by order dated April 28, 2018 allowed a petition filed by one Ayyakannu to conduct "fasting struggle" on the Marina Beach.
Madras high court
 Madras high court

Chennai: The Madras high court has said the authorities are bound by the earlier direction of the court clearly stating that no meetings or protests can be allowed in Marina.

 A division bench comprising Justices S. Manikumar and Subramonium Prasad made the observation while dismissing a Public Interest Litigation from K.Harikrishnan, which sought to restrain the authorities from allowing social organisations, political parties and registered associations in publishing in the social media, websites, pamphlets and other mode of publications of choosing Marina beach as their venue for their intended protest and rallies in violation of the order of the court dated September 3, 2018.

 

 The bench said a division bench of this court in its order dated September 3, 2018 made it clear that no meetings or protests can be allowed on Marina. The authorities are bound by the direction. The petitioner has not produced any document to show that an application was made to the authorities seeking permission for conducting meeting, the bench added and dismissed the PIL as not maintainable.

Petitioner’s counsel Rajasekhar submitted that in view of the various agitations conducted at the Marina beach were causing havoc to the general public, tourists and also to vehicular traffic in the area and taking into consideration maintenance of law and order problem, the Commissioner of Police had prohibited the Marina Beach area for conducting such meetings in the year 2017 itself. The court by order dated April 28, 2018 allowed a petition filed by one Ayyakannu to conduct "fasting struggle" on the Marina Beach. Aggrieved, the authorities preferred an appeal and this court by order dated September 3, 2018 had categorically held that the Commissioner of Police alone was entitled to identify certain locations for the purpose of holding processions and meetings and set aside the earlier order.

As per the order passed in the appeal, no parties entitled to choose the place of their convenience for holding meetings or for organising any rallies on the Marina Beach. However, the Marina Beach was being misused by various political parties, social organisations and registered organisations under the pretext of right to protest or hold public meetings on the Marina Beach without obtaining any permission or appropriate orders from the statutory authorities. According to the petitioner's discreet enquiries conducted in May first week, organisations without any permission or representation to the statutory authorities were issuing pamphlets to the general public as if the authorities have given permission to conduct meeting on the Marina Beach and hence the petitioner gave a representation to the authorities on June 1 requesting them not to allow any kind of protest or meeting in the Marina Beach. Since there was no response, the petitioner filed the present PIL, Rajasekhar added.

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT