68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Nation Current Affairs 04 Feb 2020 CBI to probe graft i ...

CBI to probe graft in Manipur Civil Services exam

DECCAN CHRONICLE.
Published Feb 4, 2020, 1:41 am IST
Updated Feb 4, 2020, 1:41 am IST
Last year, HC had quashed the exam after complaints were filed.
The HC had in October last year quashed the examination after several aspirants approached it alleging irregularities in the selection process and also ordered a CBI probe into the matter. (Representational image)
 The HC had in October last year quashed the examination after several aspirants approached it alleging irregularities in the selection process and also ordered a CBI probe into the matter. (Representational image)

New Delhi: The CBI has filed an FIR to probe the alleged irregularities in the conduct of the civil services (mains) examination for 2016 organised by the Manipur Public Service Commission (MPSC).

According to sources, the agency has registered the case against unidentified officials of the MPSC on the orders of the Manipur high court. The Manipur Civil Services Combined Competitive Examination (CSCCE), 2016 had selected 82 officers of the Manipur Civil Service, Manipur Police Service and allied services whose services were quashed following the high court orders.

 

The HC had in October last year quashed the examination after several aspirants approached it alleging irregularities in the selection process and also ordered a CBI probe into the matter. It had then instituted a two-member panel to probe the matter, which revealed “irregularities and discrepancies”, including absence of examiners’ signatures on answer scripts and manipulation of marks and allotment of marks without evaluation of answer scripts. “The MPSC appears to have taken the examination very lightly, like a child's play, completely forgetting that it would decide and determine the career of a candidate,” it had said while handing over the investigation to the CBI.

In November last year, the order was upheld by the Supreme Court, which told the agency to conduct a time-bound investigation. The panel looking into the alleged irregularities had found serious lapses such as alteration of the numbers scored, non-appointment of a Controller of Examin-ation (CoE), absence of a procedure for evaluation and tabulation of answer sheets, among others, the officials said. In its order directing the CBI to take over the probe, the high court had noted that out of 8,163 answer sheets, the examiners did not put their signatures in respect of seven papers or subjects, while in 15 papers, the supervisors did not put their signatures.

Taking note of the non-appointment of a CoE, the high court had said the rules stated that the appointment was “implicit and indispensable” and the official's presence was  required for codification of answer sheets as he shall be responsible for their safe custody and secrecy. The provisions made it clear that the CoE and the Secretary, MPSC  shall be two different persons, it had said. In the case, the Secretary, MPSC had allegedly assumed the role of the CoE as well.

...
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT