73rd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra77793336812710 Tamil Nadu2725614901223 Delhi250049898659 Gujarat18609126671155 Rajasthan98627104213 Uttar Pradesh92375439245 Madhya Pradesh87622772377 West Bengal68762768355 Bihar4452212028 Karnataka4320161057 Andhra Pradesh4112252971 Haryana3281112324 Telangana31471587105 Jammu and Kashmir3142104835 Odisha247814819 Punjab2415204347 Assam19894434 Kerala158969015 Uttarakhand115328610 Jharkhand7642975 Chhatisgarh6781892 Tripura6221730 Himachal Pradesh3691636 Chandigarh3022225 Goa126570 Manipur124110 Puducherry90330 Nagaland8000 Arunachal Pradesh3710 Meghalaya33131 Mizoram1710 Sikkim200
Lifestyle Viral and Trending 18 Jun 2018 To share or not to s ...

To share or not to share? How group dynamics affect sharing behaviour in children

DECCAN CHRONICLE
Published Jun 18, 2018, 12:46 pm IST
Updated Jun 18, 2018, 12:46 pm IST
Children already have a strong inclination to benefit others, but their behaviour is influenced by their position in the social group.
Children already have a strong inclination to benefit others, but their behaviour is influenced by their position in the social group. (Photo: Pixabay)
 Children already have a strong inclination to benefit others, but their behaviour is influenced by their position in the social group. (Photo: Pixabay)

When are primary school children willing to share valuable resources with others and when are they not? 

A team of researchers from the University of Vienna lead by cognitive biologist Lisa Horn investigated this question in a controlled behavioural experiment. 

 

The motivation to share seems to be influenced by group dynamical and physiological factors, whereas friendship between the children seems to be largely irrelevant. 

In a multipart study the researchers first observed the children’s interactions during free play in the classroom setting and further asked the children to name their best friends in the class. 

Additionally, they recorded a physiological marker for prenatal testosterone. 

Anthropologists argue that the level of testosterone present during pregnancy leads to a “masculinisation effect" in both men and women, both on a physiological level as well as regarding behavioural strategies.

 In a controlled behavioural experiment the children then had multiple opportunities to choose between two different distributions of valuable resources, namely glitter stickers: they could choose the egoistic option, in which only they themselves received a sticker, or the prosocial option, which provided a sticker to them as well as to the partner child.

On the group level the children chose the prosocial option more frequently when they were paired with another child than in a non-social control situation, where they played the game alone. However, there were also differences between the children. 
Children that had few interaction partners and therefore not a very high status in the social group had a tendency to share more and children with particularly high levels of prenatal testosterone shared significantly less. 

If one considers withholding resources from others as a competitive, masculine strategy and sharing as a cooperative, more feminine strategy, these results are a further piece of evidence for the "masculinisation effect" of prenatal testosterone. 
Surprisingly, whether children were paired with a friend or a child that neither of them had nominated as a friend had no effect on their propensity to share.

"Our results show that primary school children already have a strong inclination to benefit others. At the same time, their behaviour is influenced by their position in the social group. Here, it would be interesting to know whether the same factors also influenced younger children in a similar way. We are currently investigating this question with follow-up studies", concludes Horn.

The results of their study have been published in the journal "Scientific Reports".

Source: University of Vienna

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT