62nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra50231146001635 Tamil Nadu162778324112 Gujarat140636412858 Delhi134186540261 Rajasthan70283848163 Madhya Pradesh66653408290 Uttar Pradesh62683538161 West Bengal36671339272 Andhra Pradesh2780184156 Bihar257470211 Karnataka208965442 Punjab2060189840 Telangana1854109253 Jammu and Kashmir162180921 Odisha13365507 Haryana118476516 Kerala8485206 Assam393584 Jharkhand3701484 Uttarakhand317583 Chandigarh2621794 Chhatisgarh252640 Himachal Pradesh203594 Tripura1941650 Goa66160 Puducherry41120 Manipur3220 Meghalaya14121 Arunachal Pradesh210 Mizoram110 Sikkim100
Lifestyle Environment 07 Mar 2016 Australia's � ...

Australia's 'ugly' animals attract less study

AFP
Published Mar 7, 2016, 12:35 pm IST
Updated Mar 7, 2016, 12:34 pm IST
Researchers warn that such a bias has a potentially negative impact on conservation.
New research has found that 'ugly' animals such as bats attract less funding and investigation. (Photo: AFP)
 New research has found that 'ugly' animals such as bats attract less funding and investigation. (Photo: AFP)

Sydney: Koalas and kangaroos are subject to more scientific study than Australia's twitching rodents and bats, according to new research which finds 'ugly' animals attract less funding and investigation.

The bias towards more attractive creatures means that while 'ugly' animals make up 45 percent of Australia's native fauna, they are rarely subject to intense scientific scrutiny, said a study to be published in Mammal Review this week.

 

Researcher Trish Fleming said once mammals were classed as 'good' (such as kangaroos, echidnas and koalas), 'bad' (introduced species including cats and rabbits) or 'ugly' (native bats and rodents), the latter group had very little written about it.

"Australians are probably surprised to know how many species of native bats and rodents we have," Fleming told AFP Monday. "We know so little about them, we tend to ignore them completely. But everyone knows what a koala and kangaroo looks like."

Fleming, a wildlife biologist at Western Australia's Murdoch University, said this bias had a potential impact on conservation, with an incomplete understanding of the importance of these often small and nocturnal animals on ecosystems making them more vulnerable.

"The major problem is that if you don't know anything about their biology you could manage their environment in a way that's detrimental to them," she said. Fleming said while global and national conservation funding largely overlooked the 'ugly' species -- which include hairy rodents and the carnivorous ghost bat with its oversized, fleshy ears and sharp teeth -- these were the ones arguably most in need of research.

"For the majority of species, researchers have been able to do little more than catalogue their existence," Fleming said in a statement. "We need to document observations of their diets, habitat selection, space use and reproduction in order to identify threats and management options."

Researchers could also be discouraged from investigating obscure species for fear that the resulting papers may be too "parochial and of limited interest" to be published, she added.

With co-author Bill Bateman, Fleming has called for improved funding for the lesser known mammals. "Since European settlement (in Australia) we have lost about 20 species of mammals, we have about another 20 odd in grave danger of extinction," Curtin University's Bateman told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

"I think it would be tragic if we ended up causing the extinction of even more without even knowing anything about them."

...




ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT