133rd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra45795629935616142 Tamil Nadu2682852087844349 Andhra Pradesh176333956251604 Karnataka145830692722704 Delhi1391561252264033 Uttar Pradesh100310572711817 West Bengal80984568841785 Telangana6894649675563 Gujarat65704485612529 Bihar6203140760349 Assam4816233429115 Rajasthan4667932832732 Haryana3779631226448 Odisha3768124483258 Madhya Pradesh3508225414912 Kerala279561629988 Jammu and Kashmir2239614856417 Punjab1901512491462 Jharkhand140705199129 Chhatisgarh10109761369 Uttarakhand8008484795 Goa7075511460 Tripura5520367528 Puducherry4147253758 Manipur301818147 Himachal Pradesh2879171013 Nagaland24056594 Arunachal Pradesh179011053 Chandigarh120671520 Meghalaya9173305 Sikkim7832971 Mizoram5022820
Lifestyle Environment 17 Sep 2019 Developing countries ...

Developing countries requires substantial increase in greenhouse emissions

Published Sep 17, 2019, 10:35 am IST
Updated Sep 17, 2019, 10:35 am IST
Studies reveal that poor countries will need to increase carbon footprint to address hunger.
Two-third vegan assumes a vegan diet for two out of three meals per day, with each meal providing equal caloric content. (Photo: AFP)
 Two-third vegan assumes a vegan diet for two out of three meals per day, with each meal providing equal caloric content. (Photo: AFP)

Achieving a nutritious diet with adequate calories in developing countries will require a substantial increase in greenhouse gas emissions and water use, scientists reported Monday, calling on high-income countries to accelerate the adoption of plant-heavy diets.

Researchers at Johns Hopkins University developed a model looking at how changes to dietary patterns across 140 countries would impact greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater use at the individual and country-level, publishing their work in the journal Global Environmental Change.


They used the model to determine the per capita and countrywide climate and water footprints of nine "plant-forward" diets, which included no red meat, pescatarian, vegetarian without eliminating eggs and dairy, vegan, and others.

Keeve Nachman, the study's senior author, told AFP that much of the conversation about mitigating the effects of climate change "fails to recognize that many parts of the world are dealing with undernutrition."

"In order to get them to a place where they are not experiencing chronic undernutrition, they'll need to eat more, and accordingly, they'll need to increase their carbon footprint," he said.


"What that says to us is that in many high-income countries around the world, where we're consuming far more animal products than the global average, there's an increased urgency to start transitioning sooner rather than later towards some of these more plant-forward diets."

One encouraging finding, said the scientists, was that this goal does not necessarily require individuals to give up certain foods entirely. Their modelling showed for example that a diet in which animal protein came mainly from low food chain animals, such as small fish and molluscs, had nearly as low of an environmental impact as a vegan diet.


They also found that reducing animal food consumption by two-thirds, termed going "two-thirds vegan," generally had a lower climate and water footprint than a traditional vegetarian diet which includes dairy and egg consumption.

Two-third vegan assumes a vegan diet for two out of three meals per day, with each meal providing equal caloric content. "Some of the biggest barriers, speaking more as a person and less as a scientist, I think it can be difficult to grapple with the notion that I'm going to have to give up a single food forever," said Nachman.


"So I think what's exciting about some of the diets that we've modelled is, There are diets that don't require you to fully eliminate any particular animal products, it's all about more nuanced approach."

The study also found that a food's country of origin can have huge consequences for its climate impact. For example, one pound of beef produced in Paraguay contributes nearly 17 times more greenhouse gases than one pound of beef produced in Denmark, a disparity linked to deforestation as a result of grazing land.


A separate report published Monday by the Food and Land Use Coalition calculated that wide-ranging reform in the way food is produced and consumed could unlock US dollar 4.5 trillion in new business opportunities each year by 2030.

It outlined ten transitions, including measures to protect and restore nature and climate, empowering indigenous communities, promoting a diverse and healthy diet and reducing waste, finding these would save costs of US dollar 5.7 trillion a year, more than 15 times the investment cost of US dollar 350 billion a year.


"You can both have a better climate and better growth," Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, an ambassador for the coalition and former finance minister of Nigeria told AFP. "We don't simply say to stop eating meat, moving towards a healthier, more plant-based diet is one of the transitions that we talk about. But another is practising productive and regenerative agriculture" that rebuilds soil organic matter and restores biodiversity.