103rd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra2000641080828671 Tamil Nadu107001605921450 Delhi97200682563004 Gujarat35398254141926 Uttar Pradesh2655418154773 Telangana2231211537288 Karnataka215499246335 West Bengal2123114166736 Rajasthan1953215640447 Andhra Pradesh176998008218 Haryana1654812257260 Madhya Pradesh1460411234598 Bihar11457848888 Assam9800632814 Jammu and Kashmir82465143127 Odisha7316535333 Punjab56683989149 Kerala4594243626 Chhatisgarh3065241414 Uttarakhand2791190937 Jharkhand2339160512 Tripura140110931 Manipur13166390 Goa11984783 Himachal Pradesh9796179 Puducherry73930112 Nagaland5351820 Chandigarh4593956 Arunachal Pradesh252751 Mizoram1601230 Sikkim101520 Meghalaya50421
Entertainment Bollywood 09 Jun 2016 Udta Punjab is about ...

Udta Punjab is about real issues, not against state: Shyam Benegal

Published Jun 9, 2016, 6:24 pm IST
Updated Jun 9, 2016, 7:21 pm IST
Shyam said much of the debate over the movie was sparked because people think the film is against the state of Punjab.
Shyam feels Nihalani has exceeded his powers and ordered cuts that are ‘totally unjustified’.
 Shyam feels Nihalani has exceeded his powers and ordered cuts that are ‘totally unjustified’.

National Award-winning filmmaker Shyam Benegal has praised “Udta Punjab” for showing a “real problem” in the state and he says contrary to perception the film does not portray Punjab in bad light.

Benegal, who heads the government-appointed censor board revamp committee, was shown the film on Wednesday amid the censorship controversy around it since the film is based on drug abuse in Punjab.


“It’s an extremely well-made film but it also points out to a rather unfortunate fact that drugs routed from Central Asia to Afghanistan come into India via Punjab and the state is vulnerable to this kind of infiltration, which has caused problems over a period of time,” he told a TV news channel.

Also read: Delete ‘Punjab, MP, Parliament, cuss words’: Censor Board for Udta Punjab

The director said much of the debate over the movie was sparked because people think the film is against the state of Punjab. According to Benegal, this is a misconceived notion.

“The film in that sense points to a very important problem. I don’t think one should take it into mean that state is colluding with it. This is absolute wrong reading of the film itself according to me.” said the 81-year-old filmmaker.

“I have a feeling a lot of controversy has started because everybody feels that it is blaming the state on the contrary state is vulnerable,” said the veteran director.

Udta Punjab: BJP denies AAP charge, says Punjab has no drug problem

Benegal, however, refused to comment on the cuts demanded by the censor board in the movie. “I would not like to comment on the issue because I don’t wish to interfere in the working of the CBFC.”

One cut, which evoked a huge debate, is the removal of the word “Punjab” from the movie and its title.

Censoring Udta Punjab won't fix drug problem: Rahul Gandhi

When asked if the censor board is justified in making this demand and whether filmmakers should be given complete creative freedom, Benegal said, “I won’t comment on it because it’s the filmmaker’s view. Whether ‘Punjab’ should have been used, I won’t say as it has a lot to do with sensibilities and sensitivities. The important thing is that the filmmaker has dealt with a serious issue.”

The controversy took a political turn after parties like AAP and Congress blamed Censor Board chief Pahlaj Nihalani of buckling under pressure from the Punjab government while Nihalani accused Anurag Kashyap of taking money from AAP.

Udta Punjab row: AAP, Cong accuse SAD-BJP of influencing Censor Board

Meanwhile, another board member, Chandramukh Sharma, has come out against the functioning of Nihalani after Ashoke Pandit.

“If the chairman has suggested this type of disclaimers, I would request the chairman to go to the central government and ask to change the name of CBFC to pro of government,” Sharma said.

When asked about the cuts suggested by Nihalani for the film, he said, “Totally unjustified. The regional officer and chairman have exceeded their powers. They don’t have authority to suggest this type of cuts.”