Rajya Sabha Ethics Panel Reviews Conduct Rules for MPs
Panel considers rules on conduct, parliamentary speech and remarks against constitutional authorities
New Delhi: The Rajya Sabha Ethics Committee has sought views on whether the code of conduct for members should include explicit provisions against undermining constitutional authorities or fellow MPs through statements in the House or on public and digital platforms.
It has also asked whether the code should expressly prohibit members from misusing the protection afforded to parliamentary speech when their statements could harm the reputation of fellow members, ministers or other public figures.
Expressing concern over what it described as an increasing trend of disorderly proceedings and disregard for parliamentary customs, the committee has decided to review the code through wide-ranging consultations with political parties, state legislatures and international parliamentary bodies.
In a questionnaire circulated to political parties, the panel asked how members could be encouraged to exercise greater caution, restraint and sensitivity while discussing national heroes, historical figures and contentious interpretations of history.
“What forms of accountability should be established to support this and should the code of conduct include specific provisions guiding members participating in debates involving sensitive issues,” it asked.
The panel also sought suggestions on encouraging greater caution in the exercise of privileged freedom of speech, particularly where statements could harm others’ reputations.
“Should the code of conduct explicitly state that members must not misuse the protection afforded to them for free speech in parliamentary proceedings and if so what types of corrective or disciplinary actions would be appropriate in cases of misuse?” it asked.
In March 2025, then Rajya Sabha chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar directed the committee to review the 1998 S.B. Chavan Committee report on ethics and develop updated guidelines, taking into account technological developments and the growth of social media.
Opposition parties, including the Congress, have recently raised issues in Parliament concerning the functioning of the Election Commission and its commissioners. The government has maintained that MPs cannot discuss the issue in Parliament.
The committee, chaired by BJP MP Ghanshyam Tiwari, also asked whether stricter rules were needed to address unparliamentary language during House proceedings.
“What specific steps would you recommend to ensure members refrain from using inappropriate or offensive language in the House?” it asked.
It sought views on whether the existing scope of the code adequately addressed the ethical and behavioural standards expected of members inside and outside the House.
Political parties have been asked to provide their views with supporting reasons.
The committee discussed the review at meetings on January 20, April 28 and July 10 this year, following which the questionnaire was circulated.