No one gangs up against Principal without reason: HC on Thampu
New Delhi: Everyone would not gang up against a college principal without any reason, the Delhi High Court observed on Friday while referring to St Stephen's Principal Valson Thampu who has been facing accusations from his staff, teachers and students.
"The staff is against him, students are against him, teachers are against him. We all have studied in a college. Not everyone gangs up against the principal of a college (without a reason)," Justice Manmohan said.
The court made the observation while hearing a plea of a St Stephen's administrative officer alleging he was made to work under "deplorable" condition in a store-room infested with termites and lizards.
S K Dash, the administrative officer, has sought initiation of contempt action against Thampu for violating terms of a settlement order passed by a division bench of the High Court by making him work out of a store-room. He has also alleged that a criminal complaint was lodged against him by Thampu after he joined the college on April 21, subsequent to the settlement order.
The counsel for Thampu, on the other hand, contended that there was a "concerted effort" to "malign the image" of the college and its Principal. The court on Friday asked both sides to consider sorting out the issue as "prestige of the college was far more important". Thereafter, both sides agreed to try and settle the issue and the court listed the matter for hearing on July 22 when it has to be informed about the status.
On May 22, the court had rapped Thampu for making Dash work from a store room and had asked "why can't the Principal behave himself" and "why he is acting like this". It had also remarked that the Principal's actions were leading to adverse publicity.
Thampu had suspended Dash last year on charges of engaging in "gross misconduct", after which the administrative officer had moved court accusing him of forcing him to convert to Christianity. However, Dash rejoined the college on April 21 after a settlement order was passed by a division bench of the High Court.