Protection from the top, did Srinivasan try to shield Gurnath Meiyappan?
Chennai / New Delhi: On Meiyyappan, the report noted: “Investigations have confirmed that this individual (Gurnath Meiyappan) was a team official of a franchise. He was frequently meeting Individual 2 (name withheld) in his hotel room. This strengthens the conclusion of the committee in its interim report dated February 10 that he was in close touch with Individual 2.”
Individual 2 is obviously a prominent player of the Chennai Super Kings. In this case too, Srinivasan is culpable of not acting to correct the situation. The other major count of misdemeanor against Srinivasan, is that he tried to shield his son-in-law as a mere ‘cricket enthusiast’ when he well knew the real position of how Meiyyappan was sitting in the players’ dugout and how he was privy to team strategies as he was often in close attendance at the team’s IPL events.
Meiyyappan, the report avers, was a team official, if not the de facto owner, of CSK. Meiyyappan has been held guilty of having contacts with bookies and betting, so too Raj Kundra. And since the two were designated team officials, both their teams — CSK and Rajasthan Royals — stand to be disqualified from the Indian Premier League.
According to the relevant bye-law 11.3(c) (Clause says the agreement can be terminated if, “the Franchise, any Franchise Group Company and/or any owner acts in any way which has a material adverse effect upon the reputation or standing of the League, BCCI-IPL, BCCI, the Franchise, the team (or any other team in the League) and/or the game of cricket.) of the IPL, which is a property of BCCI and registered under the Societies Act of Tamil Nadu, a team can be disqualified.
The question now is will the Supreme Court order sanctions on teams transgressing IPL rules and regulations when it resumes hearing the case of the IPL scandals on Nov. 24.
Kundra (Individual 11), the report said, “was in touch with the bookies about betting and thus by not reporting contact with the bookie, has violated BCCI/IPL Anti-Corruption Code,” the report points out. Even more damning is the panel’s comment, “The committee also found that the investigation against this individual was abruptly and without reason stopped by the Rajasthan Police upon receiving case papers from Delhi Police.”
INDIVIDUAL 13: SRINIVISAN
- This Individual is not involved with match-fixing activity.
- This individual was not found to be involved in scuttling the investigations into match-fixing
- This individual along with four other BCCI officials was aware of the violation of the Players Code of Conduct by Individual 3, but no action was taken against Individual 3 by any of the aforesaid officials who were aware of this infraction
