• icon
  • icon
  • icon
  • icon

ISRO likely to scale down Chandrayaan-2

(File photo) Model of Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle III - (Johnxxx9 at en.Wikipedia)
(File photo) Model of Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle III - (Johnxxx9 at en.Wikipedia)

ISRO scientists are revisiting the sequel to the country's prestigious moon mission - Chandrayaan-2.

The space agency has realised that the advanced GSLV MK-III won't be available by 2014. The Plan B is to launch the mission using GSLV F-series once it clears its next mission.

“Chandrayaan-2 has been designed to go on GSLV MK-III,” a top source told Deccan Chronicle. “But the development process has run up to a brick wall following back-to-back launch failures. The moon mission is already delayed. A decision to launch it with base model of GSLV has been taken.”

ISRO has asked its Chandrayaan-2 team to tweak the programme wherever possible as GSLV can launch only lesser tonnage than the advanced MK-III version.

“This will delay the project by at least six months,” said the source.

Your Comment
Anuj Pathania 07/06/2011 - 07:49pm

ISRO should wait for GLSV MK III. Moon isn't going anywhere.

sweetz 07/06/2011 - 02:45pm

Just praying to god to make this mission successful. It should not be like Chandrayaan 1.

WhatSweetz 08/06/2011 - 05:02pm

Sweetz, you want the moon mission to be successful while at the same time saying it should not be like Chandrayaan 1! It is confusing! I would say Chandrayaan 1 was the most successful project India has ever achieved — in terms of goal setting, team co-ordination and management, accuracy and precision and of course the mass appeal!

abc 07/06/2011 - 11:33am

It's better for ISRO to go step-by-step instead of taking giant leaps. First of all ISRO should stop visualising the distant future and concentrate on the immediate future. The major component, the heart of the vehicle, the Indigenous cryogenic engine , should be designed and tested successfuly. Then bigger versions of GSLV have to be planned for. After basics are corrected ISRO can think of building on it.