• icon
  • icon
  • icon
  • icon

With Typhoon, India gets tech, freedom to act

With Typhoon, India gets tech, freedom to act

Mr Andrew Gallagher, CEO-MD of BAE Systems India, says India should avoid American and buy the Eurofighter Typhoon to reap both capability and strategic benefits. Excerpts from an interview.

The Typhoon is the ‘youngest’ aircraft in the MMRCA competition. The flip side is that it’s still a work-in-progress…

If you buy an F-16, you know what you are getting — a 1970’s product. If you go for the Typhoon, it’s been in service for six years with the Eurofighter air forces, you are getting the best platform available today, and the opportunity to upgrade it.

What do we gain in politico-strategic terms from buying European?
The Typhoon purchase will promote a couple of things. One, India’s stated ambition to develop an indigenous defence capability, in particular in this area because the Eurofighter consortium, with the full support of the governments of Germany, UK, Italy and Spain, will deliver the technology transfer commitments and the know-how, not just the source code and the paperwork. We won’t find ourselves caught up in a bureaucratic nightmare, which perhaps will happen in the case of another country, in terms of the ability to transfer technology, which will allow India a degree of sovereignty which it would not otherwise have.

With the US, you are still in CISMOA discussions, and other technology cooperation discussions that are yet to be resolved. Moreover, India has already bought the P-8I, the C-130J, it’s buying the C-17, how many more deals do the Americans want? The law of diminishing returns begins to kick in somewhere. For us, India will be buying 126 Typhoons. Money talks. India will be a key partner going forward and it will develop the aircraft according to its own needs.

Eurofighter nations build military capability in the belief that they will go to war only in coalitions, not alone. Is there a conceptual issue here with regard to the Typhoon, because India has to fight its wars alone?

What we will do is to provide India the capability to develop the aircraft to its own requirements. So, if that means that India thinks it is going to go to war on its own with its neighbours or other nations, under our obligations in the deal, we will work with India to develop the aircraft in the way that it needs. And we will also ensure that if there’s any degree of interdependence, India will have access to the support and capability that it needs to ensure its legitimate national security interests, whatever they are.

Is there US technology in the Typhoon, and will it be difficult getting unrestricted access to it?
It’s not impossible on occasion. But, in principle, if India buys the Typhoon, the relationship with India is such that whilst there may be a problem from time to time, any technology transfer which requires US approvals will come through.

I mean, BAE Systems has 45,000 employees in America, we are the fifth biggest supplier to the Pentagon. So, the US absolutely knows where its interest lies, and I have no doubt whatsoever, provided we behave responsibly, the US will step up and do the right thing.

Your Comment
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
refresh
Muralic 25/02/2011 - 10:05pm

Freedom does not come from free.. Everything can wait but not your right to self-governance and freedom from oppression. We cannot lose out to Pakisistanis and Chinese who are baying for our blood. A little show of weakness or complacency is enough for these wolves to tear us apart.

Sourabh Mahajan 22/02/2011 - 10:09pm

The process of finalising the deal is yet under process & for India we can hope for the best.

Mr Realist 22/02/2011 - 01:03pm

Eurofighter is the most expensive competitor, so their CEO has to make some excuses. Drop the expensive Rafale/Eurofighter and go for something cheaper that works as well. Maybe Super Hornet or even Gripen: 3 for the price of 2 EF/Rafale! F-16 sounds bad given that it is close to end of life.

Ajay Vikram Singh 22/02/2011 - 02:25am

Isn't it wonderful how our free media laps up every word of every CEO passing through town... these fellows never get their names in the press in their own countries, but they do in India, selling their weapons. Or maybe they just wine, dine and pay off these newspaper wallas. I'm sick of reading about the MMRCA order, it as though it is the burning issue of the century... Just imagine, we want to buy 126 of these - for the price of one (over $100m) you can open 20 top quality schools in rural India, each such school can educate 500 poor students in a year... but then who will pay to keep these arms companies and their dealers rich?

sojan therakom 25/02/2011 - 07:31am

Yes you are right, go through the villages of Haryana, Bihar, Jharkhand etc. Too athletic situation. Travel in a local train from Delhi, the capital city. Delhi got people living in cyclerikshaws, working for 5 or 10 Rs for each ride. Pak or China will never attack India, neither they can.

Sudeep 24/02/2011 - 12:35am

And yes when Pakistan and China attack you can hide in those schools and prey to the Almighty. Grow and give balanced argument than impractical ramblings copied from some NGO literature.

RohitT 23/02/2011 - 11:54pm

Yes, the money can be used to set up schools in rural areas. There are many areas which need funds such as infrastructure and health. But the MMRCA is very important. If you look at India's rival, Pakistan, they have F-16s which have been or are in the process of being upgraded. Furthermore, China is building up its military and working to develop next generation fighters. With the MMRCA, India can compete evenly or have the upper hand against its neighbors. Moreover, India will learn to develop advanced technology so they don’t have to rely on foreign defense suppliers. Once they do that, they can produce and sell products to other countries. Having an indigenous defense industry means more jobs and revenue for Indians.

you are a fool 23/02/2011 - 08:30am

Defence is as important as education. India is facing a huge threat so we should prepare for that. We are not buying defence equipment for fun.

abhishek giri 21/02/2011 - 11:09pm

Well I too believe that India should go for full technology transfer rather than figuring out the correct term for a blank. But I rather insist that the Air Force's view of the best fighter jet should be seriously taken into consideration as in the times of need our pilots need the best, rather than allies giving some moral support.

NJS 21/02/2011 - 06:02pm

Even Gripen has American tech like engine and weapons. In the event of a future ban from USA, the UK is the first supporter of America. Only Rafale with best tech without USA depemdemce with 100% ToT including source code. France is already an all=weather true supporter. Even when world banned India in 1998 due to nuclear test, only countries like France and Russia supported India. Already India has operated the Mirage which showed its great power in Kargil when Jaguar failed to hits its targets in high attitude mountain defense. The UK has the habit of supporting the US blindly, so taking a risk is not good.